Friday, May 22, 2026

Texas AG sues Meta over claims that WhatsApp doesn't provide end-to-end encryption


<p>The Texas Attorney General has sued Meta over allegations that the company’s WhatsApp messenger, used by more than 3 billion people, doesn’t provide the end-to-end encryption (E2EE) it has long claimed.</p> <p>Since at least 2016, Meta (then named Facebook) has said WhatsApp provides robust end-to-end encryption, meaning that messages are encrypted on a sender’s device with keys that are available only to the receiver's. By definition, E2EE means that no one else—including the platform itself—can read the plaintext messages.</p> <p>In sworn testimony before two US Senate committees in 2018, CEO Mark Zuckerberg <a href="https://www.congress.gov/event/115th-congress/senate-event/LC64510/text">said</a> Meta does “not see any of the content in WhatsApp; it is fully encrypted” and that “Facebook systems do not see the content of messages being transferred over WhatsApp.” The engine for this E2EE is the Signal protocol, an open source code base that multiple third-party experts have said lives up to its promises.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/05/texas-ag-sues-meta-over-claims-that-whatsapp-doesnt-provide-end-to-end-encryption/">Read full article</a></p> <p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/05/texas-ag-sues-meta-over-claims-that-whatsapp-doesnt-provide-end-to-end-encryption/#comments">Comments</a></p> Reference : https://ift.tt/ip0TYqc

Developers: Get Your Medical Mobile App Verified By IEEE


<img src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/conceptual-illustration-of-user-interface-layers-such-as-networking-information-assurance-and-design.jpg?id=66768355&width=1245&height=700&coordinates=0%2C62%2C0%2C63"/><br/><br/><p>Patients who use mobile applications to manage medical conditions including depression and chronic pain might assume the apps have been evaluated by regulatory agencies to be safe and effective. But that isn’t necessarily the case.</p><p>Most of the more than 55,000 medical apps that claim to diagnose or treat a condition—or ones that provide clinical decision support, known as “therapeutic” apps—have never been assessed by any trusted neutral bodies or regulatory agencies to evaluate them for technical soundness, ethical design, or clinical benefit. The apps often don’t comply with regional data security and privacy laws to protect people’s sensitive health information.</p><p>Medical apps differ from traditional wellness apps, which provide users with insights into becoming healthier by, for example, tracking fitness activities, monitoring blood pressure, and analyzing sleep patterns.</p><p>There is no reliable way to verify that therapeutic apps deliver the results they indicate. To help ensure such apps are credible, the <a href="https://standards.ieee.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">IEEE Standards Association</a> (IEEE SA) recently launched the <a href="https://standards.ieee.org/products-programs/icap/mobile-health-app-registry/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">IEEE Global Medical Mobile App Assessment and Registry</a>. The publicly searchable directory is designed to list apps that have been vetted by experts across several criteria including technical soundness, ethical design, compliance with data security and privacy regulations, and clinical efficacy, which is evidence of a clinical benefit for the patient.</p><p>“Patients, clinicians, payers, and health care systems often struggle to distinguish clinically meaningful therapeutic apps from those that are simply well-marketed,” says IEEE Senior Member <a href="https://research.bidmc.org/yuriquintana" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Yuri Quintana</a>, chair of the assessment and registry program. He is chief of the <a href="https://bidmc.org/departments-divisions/medicine/clinical-informatics" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">clinical informatics division</a> at <a href="https://bidmc.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center</a>, in Boston. “Our goal is to establish a standardized review method using criteria developed by experts.”</p><h2>Why regulation is lacking</h2><p>Because the apps are intended for medical use without being part of a medical implement, they fall under the designation of <a href="https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/cdrh-international-affairs/international-medical-device-regulators-forum-imdrf" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">software as a medical device</a> (SaMD), according to the <a href="https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/cdrh-international-affairs/international-medical-device-regulators-forum-imdrf" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">International Medical Device Regulators Forum</a>. SaMD is supposed to be regulated by public health agencies such as the U.S. <a href="https://www.fda.gov/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Food and Drug Administration</a>, but the apps have developed and grown in popularity so quickly that regulators haven’t been able to keep up, Quintana says. Some companies have received approval, but most have not, he says.</p><p>Many users are unaware of the regulatory gap, he says.</p><p>“Seeing an app from a well-known company often creates the impression that it has been meaningfully vetted for safety and efficacy, even when that is not the case,” he says.</p><p>Some companies are using deceptive advertising to sell their product, he adds. Marketing materials might claim that all of a company’s health apps are certified, even though only one app has been approved by a regulatory body to treat a particular condition. Or the verbiage might imply the company has clinical evidence proving its application works, even though the app has never been tested independently.</p><p>Another concern is that updated apps aren’t being vetted, says <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/mpalombini/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Maria Palombini</a>, IEEE SA’s director of health care and life sciences global practice lead.</p><p>“The original app might have received approval from a regulatory agency, but not the updated version,” Palombini says. “There could have been significant changes from the original.”</p><p>“Not every medical-related app triggers the same regulatory classification or review across jurisdictions,” Quintana adds. “That leaves a large gray zone of clinically relevant but lower-risk apps that haven’t undergone an independent assessment. The IEEE registry was created to help fill these gaps.</p><p>“IEEE is the best organization to address this problem because this is fundamentally a standards, trust, interoperability, and conformity assessment challenge,” he says. IEEE “is the world’s largest technical professional organization, with deep expertise in developing globally recognized standards including in <a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/ieee-standard-biomedical-devices-data" target="_self">health care</a>, <a href="https://standards.ieee.org/initiatives/cybersecurity-standards-projects/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">cybersecurity</a>, <a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/two-new-ai-ethics-certifications" target="_self">AI ethics</a>, and <a href="https://standards.ieee.org/ieee/1547/5915/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">interoperability</a>.”</p><p>“Through the <a href="https://standards.ieee.org/products-programs/icap/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">IEEE Conformity Assessment Program</a>, we already run rigorous assessment and registry programs,” Palombini says. “Our neutral, consensus-driven, multidisciplinary approach—bringing together clinicians, regulators, developers, and ethicists without commercial bias—makes IEEE uniquely positioned to create trustworthy global guardrails that can scale across jurisdictions and support regulatory harmonization.”</p><h2>How the registry works</h2><p>The assessment framework was developed by a multidisciplinary group of 35 volunteer experts from 10 countries, Quintana says. The panel includes academics, AI experts, app developers, clinicians, ethicists, mental health experts, patient advocates, regulators, researchers, technologists, and those who assess safety in health care.</p><p>The registry is for any app used for clinical care or therapeutics that claims to demonstrate a medical benefit. That includes apps designed for cardiology, diabetes, mental health, neurology, oncology, rehabilitation, and respiratory diseases, Quintana says.</p><p>Initially, he says, the focus will be on apps that aim to treat mental health conditions, given the large number of offerings in that area and the registry committee’s expertise.</p><p>The submission of apps is voluntary. There is no government mandate that requires a company to use the IEEE registry.</p><p>The products will be evaluated against about 150 consensus-based criteria across three major areas: </p><ul><li><strong>Clinical efficacy</strong> including therapeutic effectiveness, any sustained benefits, risk management, comparison to standard care, user engagement, and real clinical value.</li><li><strong>Technical soundness</strong> including accessibility, privacy and security, error handling, interoperability, AI governance, usability, and operational quality.</li><li><strong>Ethical design</strong> including bias prevention, patient consent, data governance, conflict-of-interest transparency, responsible use of AI and large language models, and prioritization of public health benefits.</li></ul><p>IEEE charges a nonrefundable submission fee that covers the cost of the assessment plus the registry’s annual subscription for the first year.</p><p>Developers first must demonstrate they are a legally established entity before they can complete the <a href="https://forms.zohopublic.com/healthappregistryie1/form/AppPublisherRegistrationForm/formperma/vKV62XuzwMV6hoOZnUv3QiFo8BDLpUSFp2CZlOOIOyM" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">app publisher registration form</a> and then submit documentation and attestations about the product.</p><p>The IEEE review of an app is estimated to take six to eight weeks, Palombini says. The assessment results will be privately shared with the app publisher, she says, and to be listed in the registry, an app must achieve more than 85 percent compliance in each category.</p><p>Upgraded apps must be submitted and reassessed, Palombini says. Similar to how users are notified when an app on their smart devices has , the registry will be notified when listed apps have a new update available, she says.</p><p>Applicants who do not pass the assessment are to receive feedback explaining why. They will be given an opportunity to make changes or provide additional documentation, Palombini says.</p><p>“It’s a pretty methodological process, with checks and balances,” Quintana says. “We’re being very transparent about the process.”</p><p>Approved apps added to the registry receive an IEEE certification badge and submission identifier, which the company can display on its website, app store listings, and marketing materials.</p><p>“The badge serves as visible proof that the app has met the independent, consensus-based assessment for clinical value, technical robustness, and ethical design,” Quintana says.</p><p>The registry will be publicly available at no cost, he says.</p><p>Patients and families seeking safe, trustworthy apps—and payers and insurers evaluating reimbursement potential—will find the registry helpful, he says.</p><p>The <a href="https://forms.zohopublic.com/healthappregistryie1/form/AppPublisherRegistrationForm/formperma/vKV62XuzwMV6hoOZnUv3QiFo8BDLpUSFp2CZlOOIOyM" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">application website</a> is open. The public registry page does not yet list a specific count of approved apps because assessments are ongoing. Approved apps and their unique identifiers are to be published when the initial reviews are completed.</p><p>To learn more, you can watch a <a href="https://engagestandards.ieee.org/medical-app-registry-webinar.html?_gl=1*1bfk6ug*_gcl_au*MTcwMjc4NjczMy4xNzc2Mjc4MzQy*_ga*MTE2MjkxMjYxMC4xNzc2Mjc4MzQy*_ga_XDL2ME6570*czE3NzgwOTUwNTIkbzIzJGcxJHQxNzc4MDk1ODUzJGo2MCRsMCRoMA.." rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">webinar</a> recorded in March.</p>The assessment framework that underpins the registry is supporting the formal recognition of <a href="https://standards.ieee.org/products-programs/icap/mobile-health-app-registry/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">IEEE P3962 Standard for Criteria Assessment Framework f</a> Reference: https://ift.tt/qEG0YX2

A hacker group is poisoning open source code at an unprecedented scale


<p>A so-called software <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/the-untold-story-of-solarwinds-the-boldest-supply-chain-hack-ever/">supply chain attack</a>, in which hackers corrupt a legitimate piece of software to hide their own malicious code, was once a relatively rare event but one that haunted the cybersecurity world with its insidious threat of turning any innocent application into a dangerous foothold in a victim’s network. Now <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/meta-pauses-work-with-mercor-after-data-breach-puts-ai-industry-secrets-at-risk/">one group of cybercriminals</a> has turned that occasional nightmare into a near-weekly episode, corrupting hundreds of open source tools, extorting victims for profit, and sowing a new level of distrust in an entire ecosystem used to create the world’s software.</p> <p>On Tuesday night, open source code platform GitHub announced that it had been breached by hackers in one such software supply chain attack: A GitHub developer had installed a “poisoned” extension for VSCode, a plug-in for a commonly used code editor that, like GitHub itself, is owned by Microsoft. As a result, the hackers behind the breach, an increasingly notorious group called TeamPCP, claim to have accessed around 4,000 of GitHub’s code repositories. GitHub’s statement confirmed that it had found at least 3,800 compromised repositories while noting that, based on its findings so far, they all contained GitHub’s own code, not that of customers.</p> <p>“We are here today to advertise GitHub’s source code and internal orgs for sale,” TeamPCP wrote on BreachForums, a forum and marketplace for cybercriminals. “Everything for the main platform is there and I very am happy to send samples to interested buyers to verify absolute authenticity.”</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/05/a-hacker-group-is-poisoning-open-source-code-at-an-unprecedented-scale/">Read full article</a></p> <p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/05/a-hacker-group-is-poisoning-open-source-code-at-an-unprecedented-scale/#comments">Comments</a></p> Reference : https://ift.tt/AIiVDKc

Thursday, May 21, 2026

US government takes $2 billion equity stake in nine quantum computing firms


<p>The US government will take equity stakes worth a total of $2 billion in a slew of quantum computing companies, including a startup backed by a firm with links to the Trump family and one taken public by a Pentagon official.</p> <p>The announcement by the commerce department that it had signed letters of intent with nine companies—including GlobalFoundries and IBM—sent shares in quantum specialists soaring on Thursday.</p> <p>Both IBM, which is set to get $1 billion, and GlobalFoundries, which will receive $375 million, were up more than 6 percent in pre-market trading. D-Wave Quantum, an awardee that was taken public in 2022 by Emil Michael—now a top Pentagon official—was up more than 20 percent.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/05/us-government-takes-2-billion-equity-stake-in-nine-quantum-computing-firms/">Read full article</a></p> <p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/05/us-government-takes-2-billion-equity-stake-in-nine-quantum-computing-firms/#comments">Comments</a></p> Reference : https://ift.tt/zFUTfNL

SEM-Guided Low-kV FIB Finishing for Leading-Edge Semiconductor Failure Analysis


<img src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/zeiss-logo-above-the-slogan-seeing-beyond-on-a-dark-curved-rectangle.png?id=66728517&width=980"/><br/><br/><p>Discover how the ZEISS Crossbeam 750 FIBSEM sets a new benchmark for precise TEM lamella prep, tomography, and advanced nanofabrication. This delivers better resolution, better SNR, larger usable FOV, and shorter acquisition times. Learn how uninterrupted FIB milling will reduce damage and rework, accelerate time to TEM, and increase first pass success—so your FA, yield, and materials teams make faster, confident data driven decisions.</p><p><span>Join us to discover how the new ZEISS Crossbeam 750 with its see while you mill capability delivers precision and clarity—every time—for demanding FIB-SEM workflows. </span>Designed for extremely challenging TEM lamella preparation, tomography, advanced nanofabrication, and APT‑ready lift‑out, Crossbeam 750 combines a new Gemini 4 SEM objective lens, a double deflector, and a next‑generation scan generator to elevate both image quality and process confidence. You’ll learn how better resolution and better SNR translate into more image detail and shorter acquisition times, while the low‑kV FIB performance enables more precise lamella prep.</p><p>We’ll demonstrate High Dynamic Range (HDR) Mill + SEM—an interwoven SEM/FIB scanning mode that suppresses FIB‑generated background. This enables immediate, clean visual feedback, even during nudging the FIB pattern live while milling . The result: confident endpointing with uninterrupted FIB milling and pristine, metrology‑grade surfaces with the lowest possible sample damage. </p><p><span><span>This session is ideal for semiconductor failure analysists, yield teams and materials scientists seeking faster time‑to‑TEM, higher first‑pass success, and consistent outcomes at low kV. See how Crossbeam 750 empowers you to make earlier stop‑milling decisions, cut rework, and reliably plan turnaround time—so you can move from sample to insight with confidence.</span></span></p><p><span><span></span><a href="https://events.bizzabo.com/868497/home" target="_blank">Register now for this free webinar!</a></span></p> Reference: https://events.bizzabo.com/868497/home

Wednesday, May 20, 2026

Google publishes exploit code threatening millions of Chromium users


<p>Google on Wednesday published exploit code for an unfixed vulnerability in its Chromium browser codebase that threatens millions of people using Chrome, Microsoft Edge, and virtually all other Chromium-based browsers.</p> <p>The proof-of-concept code exploits the Browser Fetch programming interface, a standard that allows long videos and other large files to be downloaded in the background. An attacker can use the exploit to create a connection for monitoring some aspects of a user’s browser usage and as a proxy for viewing sites and launching denial-of-service attacks. Depending on the browser, the connections either reopen or remain open even after it or the device running it has rebooted.</p> <h2>Unfixed for 29 months (and counting)</h2> <p>The unfixed vulnerability can be exploited by any website a user visits. In effect, a compromise amounts to a limited backdoor that makes a device part of a limited botnet. The capabilities are limited to the same things a browser can do, such as visit malicious sites, provide anonymous proxy browsing by others, enable proxied DDoS attacks, and monitor user activity. Nonetheless, the exploit could allow an attacker to wrangle thousands, possibly millions, of devices into a network. Once a separate vulnerability becomes available, the attacker could use it to then compromise all those devices.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/05/google-publishes-exploit-code-threatening-millions-of-chromium-users/">Read full article</a></p> <p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/05/google-publishes-exploit-code-threatening-millions-of-chromium-users/#comments">Comments</a></p> Reference : https://ift.tt/Pj3Nyid

Will Robotics Have a ChatGPT Moment?


<img src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/a-collection-of-5-robots-against-colored-backgrounds.jpg?id=66734221&width=1245&height=700&coordinates=0%2C88%2C0%2C88"/><br/><br/><p>Over the next few decades, billions of autonomous, AI-powered robots will work alongside people in factories, perform tedious tasks in warehouses, care for the elderly, <a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/collections/darpa-subterranean-challenge/" target="_blank">assist in unsafe disaster areas</a>, deliver packages and food to our doorsteps, and eventually, help out in our homes. Some will look like us, and many won’t. What is certain is that regardless of form factor, robots will all rely heavily on AI in order to deliver real-world value.</p><div class="rm-embed embed-media"><iframe height="110px" id="noa-web-audio-player" src="https://embed-player.newsoveraudio.com/v4?key=q5m19e&id=https://spectrum.ieee.org/robotics-ai-breakthrough?draft=1&bgColor=F5F5F5&color=1b1b1c&playColor=1b1b1c&progressBgColor=F5F5F5&progressBorderColor=bdbbbb&titleColor=1b1b1c&timeColor=1b1b1c&speedColor=1b1b1c&noaLinkColor=556B7D&noaLinkHighlightColor=FF4B00&feedbackButton=true" style="border: none" width="100%"></iframe></div><p><span>In 2025, total investments in robotics companies reached </span><a href="https://www.cbinsights.com/research/report/venture-trends-2025/" target="_blank">a record $40.7 billion, accounting for 9 percent of all venture funding</a><span>. The multibillion dollar question therefore is this: What will it take for AI-powered robots to begin to have a serious economic impact? Many of today’s robotics and AI companies are making bold claims, such as that humanoid robots will </span><a href="https://www.1x.tech/" target="_blank">soon be coming into our homes</a><span>, but there’s still a big gap between promise and reality.</span></p><p><span></span><span>The promise of robots that live and work alongside us has been the stuff of science fiction for a very long time. And while many programmers have tried to make that promise a reality, the physical world is just too complicated for traditional computer programs to handle the endless complexity it presents. Thanks to AI, robots are no longer being programmed—instead, they learn to operate in the real world. With enough practice, they can learn to perceive and understand the world around them, reason about that world, and use that reason and understanding to perform tasks that are useful, reliable, and safe.</span></p><p>The two of us have worked at the forefront of AI and robotics for the last decade, as a <a href="https://engineering.oregonstate.edu/people/jonathan-hurst" target="_blank">Professor in Robotics at Oregon State University</a> and <a href="https://www.agilityrobotics.com/about/leadership" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Co-Founder of Agility Robotics</a>, and as <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/hanspeter/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">former CEO</a> of the <a href="https://everydayrobots.ai/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Everyday Robots moonshot at Google X</a>. Our experience deploying AI-powered robots in real-world settings has given us a perspective on where AI can be used to great benefit in complex robotic systems in the near term, and where we are still on the frontier of science fiction. We believe AI will enable an inflection point in robotics advances, but that it will be through the well-engineered application of coordinated systems of different AI tools rather than a single ChatGPT-style breakthrough.</p><p>As the excitement around AI is matched only by the uncertainty of what will be possible, here are five hard truths that will define AI in robotics.</p><h2>1. The YouTube-to-Reality Gap Is Real</h2><p>For years we have been seeing videos on YouTube with humanoid robots performing amazing moves on everything from a dance floor to an obstacle course. The inside knowledge in robotics is to “never trust a YouTube robot video.” The gap between real robots that can perform real work in unstructured human environments and carefully scripted and edited robot performances remains significant. The latest performance to get a lot of attention was a <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUmlv814aJo" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">martial arts show</a> featuring Unitree humanoid robots performing with children at the Chinese 2026 Spring Festival Gala. While impressive, this falls into a long lineage of tightly scripted robotic performances, where everything has been carefully choreographed and planned in advance. The low-level controls, synchronization, and choreography were stunning, yet the Spring Gala robot performance showed a level of autonomy and intelligence much closer to industrial robots building cars in a factory than something that will show up in your living room any time soon. </p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-youtube"> <span class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="d5c524bfa673932ad736d1599aad9c93" style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;"><iframe frameborder="0" height="auto" lazy-loadable="true" scrolling="no" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/mUmlv814aJo?rel=0" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;" width="100%"></iframe></span> </p><p><span>Seeing these kinds of demos nevertheless raises questions about where robotics really is. If robots can perform kung fu moves and do backflips and dance, why aren’t they also showing up on factory floors yet? And why can’t they do the dishes in my home after dinner? The simple answer is this: Making AI-powered robots capable of performing general tasks in varied human environments is still </span><em><em>really</em></em><span> hard. While impressive technological feats like those at the Spring Festival may make it look like we could be very close, the use of AI in these demos is only for low-level motor control (to keep the robots from falling over) and therefore is only a small part of the solution for robots to be general purpose in the real, unstructured spaces where we humans live and work.</span></p><h2>2. Data Is An Unsolved Challenge</h2><p>Large Language Models like OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Anthropic’s Claude were initially trained on an internet-scale database of text. The world woke up one day in late 2022 to ChatGPT demonstrating that AI computers could suddenly “speak” to us in prose or verse and about seemingly any topic. LLMs have turned out to generalize well and are now able to take multimodal input (text, images, video) and produce multimodal output. Importantly, the corpus of training data was both enormous and human-generated, which are characteristics that form the gold standard for AI training.</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image rm-float-left rm-resized-container rm-resized-container-25" data-rm-resized-container="25%" style="float: left;"> <img alt="A series of four images, including robots working in a contained factory space, in an open indoor factory, outdoors in the real world delivering a package, and working with a human to move a couch in an apartment." class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="f8dd8681a93fee0b55cfebeab420789a" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="a0903" loading="lazy" src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/a-series-of-four-images-including-robots-working-in-a-contained-factory-space-in-an-open-indoor-factory-outdoors-in-the-real.jpg?id=66734272&width=980"/> <small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">The fastest path to robots as part of everyday life may emerge through a range of robot forms performing increasingly sophisticated applications and employing a range of AI tools.</small><small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit...">Agility Robotics</small></p><p>Giving AI a body (in the form of a robot) so that it can engage with people in the physical world continues to be a very difficult and broadly unsolved problem. AI models for general-purpose robotics must simultaneously satisfy multiple, often conflicting, physical, geometric, and temporal limitations while operating in unstructured, dynamic environments. In order to generalize, robot models need to be trained on data gathered in a high-dimensional configuration space, where “dimensions” represent text, lighting conditions, degrees of freedom, joint limits, velocities, force, and safety boundaries, just to mention a few. Importantly, this must be <em><em>good</em></em> data—it must contain many examples from what amounts to an infinite number of possible configurations in the physical world.</p><p>Since there are very few existing sources of data like this, approaches like teleoperation, video analysis, motion capture of humans, and self-exploration in simulation and in the real world are all seen as important ways to collect data. It’s a Herculean task. For example, at Everyday Robots at Google X, we ran 240 million robot instances in our simulator over the course of 2022 to collect training data, mostly to train a trash-sorting model. Similar amounts of data will be needed for every skill, to get to a similar level of capability, which is not yet human level.</p><h2>3. There Will Be No Single Robot AI</h2><p>We are far away from a moment where a single AI model might allow general-purpose robots to live and work alongside us. </p><p>General-purpose robots can have wheels or legs. They can have one, two, three, or more arms. Some have propellers and can fly, while others may be designed to operate under water. Some will drive on busy roads. The physical world is infinitely varied and complex. And then there are all the people and other animals that will be surrounding the robots. How do you train a model to operate a robot safely and reliably in all of these settings? The simple answer is, You don’t. At least not for quite some time.</p><p>We believe the winning AI architecture leading to the next big breakthroughs in general-purpose robotics will be “agentic AI” for robots, which are high-level coordinating models that can reason, plan, use tools, and learn from outcomes to execute complex tasks with limited supervision. Agentic, high-level models running on robots will invoke a system of specialized ones for different types of tasks. We will likely soon see multiple robots collaborating and coordinating with each other through their on-board agentic AI models.</p><p>AI tools are unlocking new and powerful capabilities in robotics, which in turn will enable new solutions and new markets. It’s encouraging to see these new models being made broadly available, some even as open-source solutions. This availability is akin to what happened with the internet: Real progress occurred when it became ubiquitous. We anticipate an inevitable democratization of complex behaviors in robotics with wide access to these AI tools and technologies.</p><h2>4. Hardware Is Still Very Hard</h2><p>Robots are complex systems with many parts that all need to work together with great precision. For a robot to be useful and safe, every part of it must be coordinated, from its perception systems, to the computer controlling it, all the way down to its individual actuators.</p><p>Actuators—that is, the motors and gears—are a good example of an important part of the robot where what got us here won’t get us there. The actuators used at scale by most industrial robots will not work for robots that will operate in human environments. If these robots accidentally collide with an obstacle, the resulting impacts are harsh, forces are high, and things break. Humans don’t move in this way. We are far more compliant in how we interact with the world, and we’re constantly making contact with our environment and using that contact to help us accomplish things. </p><p>Consider the challenge of inserting a key in a lock: Humans typically don’t do this by aligning the key perfectly with the keyhole. Instead, we just feel for the edge of the keyhole and jiggle the key in. Robots need to be able to operate in novel ways to achieve comparable capabilities by using a new class of actuators that are sensitive to force and able to have a compliant interaction with the environment. While these kinds of actuators do exist, they are not yet generally available at scale for robot systems designed to operate around people.</p><h2>5. Real Value Comes From “Easy” Tasks</h2><p>There’s a big difference between tasks that look impressive and real-world tasks that provide value. Robotics is a perfect example of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moravec%27s_paradox" target="_blank">Moravec’s paradox</a>, which states that tasks that are hard for humans are easy for computers (like multiplying two big numbers), and tasks easy for humans (like a toddler’s movements) are extremely difficult for computers and robots.</p><p>Serving customers is an unforgiving reality check, because customers only care about solving the real problems they have. If we are to deploy AI-based robot solutions, they must outperform the way things are currently done, while demonstrating reliable performance metrics and safety. Agility Robotics’ early work to deploy our humanoid robot Digit in customer locations led to the realization that our first obstacle was safety: Robots that balance and manipulate objects in human spaces bring new types of risk to the workplace. In the first <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJpTpUqjgrY" target="_blank">humanoid deployments</a>, physical barriers were necessary, and Agility kicked off a multi-year engineering effort to solve the safety challenge, touching nearly every aspect of robot design and relying heavily on new AI-based approaches to human detection and behavior control.</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-youtube"> <span class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="2e10035a69200933f1594941bc6121ce" style="display:block;position:relative;padding-top:56.25%;"><iframe frameborder="0" height="auto" lazy-loadable="true" scrolling="no" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/E2g1APtSuUM?rel=0" style="position:absolute;top:0;left:0;width:100%;height:100%;" width="100%"></iframe></span> </p><p><a href="https://everydayrobots.ai/vision" target="_blank">Everyday Robots</a> at Google deployed robots in 2019 that worked autonomously in office buildings doing chores like cleaning cafe tables and sorting trash. We quickly learned how “messy” and difficult the real world is for a robot. This experience informed the architecture and deployment of our AI systems while also gathering real-world data that could be combined with simulation data for training and improving models.</p><p>This focus on creating a product to meet specific customer needs and deploying robots in real-world settings is the only way to inform the structure of the AI tools and infrastructure for near-term utility on a path towards long-term broader capability and generality. There will be no “aha” moment, no silver bullet algorithm, and no volume of data sufficient to produce a general-purpose robot without extensive real-world experience. </p><h2>AI Robots Are Coming, One Step at a Time</h2>As we look to the future, there is no doubt that the world is bringing AI into the physical world through robots. We are at the beginning of a “<a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/is-a-cambrian-explosion-coming-for-robotics" target="_self">Cambrian explosion</a>“ of useful, intelligent machines. We believe AI is not one tool, but a huge frontier of technical approaches that is unlocking new capabilities so powerful, they will define our economy moving forward. This will happen not in one single definitive moment, but as an ongoing set of small and large breakthroughs, where AI-driven robots begin to provide real value in a few tasks, and then a few more, with impacts unfolding across numerous $100 billion-plus markets that will dramatically improve the quality of our lives. Reference: https://ift.tt/vrcMzAg

Tuesday, May 19, 2026

In stunning display of stupid, secret CISA credentials found in public GitHub repo


<p>Security researcher Brian Krebs <a href="https://krebsonsecurity.com/2026/05/cisa-admin-leaked-aws-govcloud-keys-on-github/">brings us the news</a> that America's <a href="https://www.cisa.gov/">Cybersecurity &amp; Infrastructure Agency</a> (CISA) has had a large store of plaintext passwords, SSH private keys, tokens, and "other sensitive CISA assets" exposed in a public GitHub repo since at least November 2025.</p> <p>The now-offline public repo—named, somewhat aspirationally, "Private-CISA"—was brought to Krebs' attention by GitGuardian's <a href="https://blog.gitguardian.com/author/guillaumevaladon/">Guillaume Valadon</a>, who was alerted to the repo's presence by GitGuardian's public code scans. Krebs says that Valadon approached him after receiving no responses from the Private-CISA repo's owner.</p> <p>In an email to Krebs, Valadon claimed that the repo's commit logs show that GitHub's default protections against committing secrets—protections designed to protect unwitting or unskilled developers against exactly this kind of stupidness—had been disabled by the repo's administrator.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/05/in-stunning-display-of-stupid-secret-cisa-credentials-found-in-public-github-repo/">Read full article</a></p> <p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/05/in-stunning-display-of-stupid-secret-cisa-credentials-found-in-public-github-repo/#comments">Comments</a></p> Reference : https://ift.tt/ZKpS56r

Monday, May 18, 2026

What Makes a Job Dull, Dirty, or Dangerous?


<img src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/a-curbside-trash-can-being-lifted-by-a-mechanical-arm-attached-to-the-side-of-a-garbage-truck.jpg?id=66736070&width=1245&height=700&coordinates=0%2C178%2C0%2C178"/><br/><br/><p>For years, the field of robotics has used the terms “dull, dirty, and dangerous” (DDD) to describe the types of tasks or jobs where robots might be useful—by doing work that’s undesirable for people. A <a href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1349822.1349827" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">classic example of a DDD job</a> is one of “repetitive physical labor on a steaming hot factory floor involving heavy machinery that threatens life and limb.”</p><p><span></span><span>But determining which human activities fit into these categories is not as straightforward as it seems. What exactly is a “dull” task and who makes that assumption? Is “dirty” work just about needing to wash your hands afterwards, or is there also an aspect of social stigma? What data can we rely on to classify jobs as “dangerous?” </span><a href="https://rai-inst.com/resources/papers/dull-dirty-dangerous-understanding-the-past-present-and-future-of-a-key-motivation-for-robotics/" target="_blank">Our recent work</a> (which was not dull at all) tackles these questions and proposes a framework to help roboticists understand the job context for our technology.</p><p>First, we did an empirical analysis of robotics publications between 1980 and 2024 that mention DDD and found that only 2.7% define DDD and only 8.7% provide examples of tasks or jobs. The definitions vary, and many of the examples aren’t particularly specific (e.g., “industrial manufacturing,” “home care”). <span>Next, we reviewed the social science literature in anthropology, economics, political science, psychology, and sociology to develop better definitions for “dull,” “dirty,” and “dangerous” work. Again, while it might </span><em>seem</em><span> intuitive which tasks to put into these buckets, it turns out that there are some underlying social, economic, and cultural factors that matter.</span></p><h3>Dangerous Work: Occupations or tasks that result in injury or risk of harm</h3><p><span></span><span>It’s possible to measure the danger of a task or job by using reported information: there are administrative records and surveys that provide numbers on occupational injury rates and hazardous risk factors. While that seems straightforward, it’s important to understand how these data were collected, reported, and verified.</span></p><p>First, occupational injuries tend to be underreported, with some studies estimating <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24507952/" target="_blank">up to 70% of cases missing in administrative databases</a>. Second, injuries and risk factors are <a href="https://www.ilo.org/publications/quick-guide-sources-and-uses-statistics-occupational-safety-and-health" target="_blank">rarely disaggregated by characteristics like gender, migration status, formal/informal employment, and work activities</a>. For example, because most personal protective equipment, such as masks, vests, and gloves, are sized for men, <a href="https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=GdmEDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT8&dq=Caroline+Criado+Perez.+Invisible+Women:+Data+Bias+in+a+World+Designed+for+Men.+Vintage+Books,+New+York,+NY,+2019.+ISBN+1-68335-314-5.+&ots=zr92hEL4HB&sig=bepPAzAfk_khTOb8BO6xWjspDJM#v=onepage&q&f=false" target="_blank">women in dangerous work environments face increased safety risks</a>.</p><p>These caveats are an opportunity for robotics to be helpful: If we went out and looked for it, we could probably find some less obvious dangerous work where robotics might be an important intervention, not to mention some groups that are disproportionately affected and would benefit from more workplace safety.</p><h3>Dirty Work: Occupations or tasks that are physically, socially, or morally tainted</h3><p><span></span><span>Colloquially, most people might think of dirty work as involving </span><em>physical</em><span> dirtiness, like trash, cleaning, or hazardous substances But social science literature makes clear that dirty work is </span><a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/799402" target="_blank">also about <em>stigma</em></a><span>. Socially tainted jobs are often servile or involve interacting with stigmatized groups (e.g., correctional officer) and morally tainted jobs include tasks that people commonly perceive as sinful, deceptive, or otherwise defying norms of civility (e.g., stripper, collection agent.)</span></p><p>“Dirty work” is a social construct that can vary across time (like <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-00729-001" target="_blank">tattoo industry stigma</a> in the US) and culture (such as nursing in the <a href="https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9780230393530_8" target="_blank">US</a> vs. in <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953606003418" target="_blank">Bangladesh</a>). One way to measure whether work is “dirty” is by using the closely related concept of occupational prestige, captured through quantitative surveys where people rank jobs. Another way to measure it is through qualitative data, like ethnographies and interviews. Similar to “dangerous,” we see some hidden opportunities for robotics in “dirty” work. But one of our more interesting takeaways from the data is that a lower-ranked job can be something that <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/259134" target="_blank">the workers themselves enjoy or find immense pride and meaning in</a>. If we care about what tasks are truly undesirable, understanding this worker perspective is important.</p><h2>Dull Work: Occupations or tasks that are repetitive and lacking in autonomy</h2><p>When it comes to defining dull work, what matters most is workers’ own experiences. Outsiders can make a lot of false assumptions about what tasks have value and meaning. Sometimes things that seem boring or routine create the right conditions for <a href="https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/291654/the-mind-at-work-by-mike-rose/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">developing skills and competence</a>, such as the concentration needed for woodworking, or for <a href="https://www.anthropology-news.org/articles/what-counts-as-drudgery-and-who-decides/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">socializing and support</a>, when tasks are done alongside others. Instead of assuming that repetitive work is negative, it’s important to examine qualitative data on how people experience the work and what purpose it serves for <em>them</em>.</p><h3>DDD: An actionable framework<br/></h3><p>In our paper, we propose a framework to help the robotics community explore how automation impacts individual jobs. For each term—dull, dirty, and dangerous—the framework gathers key pieces of information to reflect on what physical or social aspects of the task are, in fact, DDD. Worker perspective is an important part of all three considerations. The framework also emphasizes awareness of context, i.e. the physical and social environment of an occupation and industry that can influence the DDD nature of a task. Our corresponding <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.04746" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">worksheet</a> suggests existing data sources to draw on, as well as encouraging us to seek out multiple perspectives and consider potential sources of bias in the information.</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image"> <img alt="A diagram illustrating that tasks that are dangerous, dirty, or dull depend on how the workers feel about the social and physical environment." class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="0e5225e853b1fd8d456f6ae58d665e04" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="ff883" loading="lazy" src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/a-diagram-illustrating-that-tasks-that-are-dangerous-dirty-or-dull-depend-on-how-the-workers-feel-about-the-social-and-physica.png?id=66736573&width=980"/> <small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">What makes tasks dull, dirty, or dangerous depends on the perspective of the humans doing those tasks.</small><small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit...">RAI</small></p><p><span>Let’s take, for example, the waste and <a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/single-stream-recycling" target="_blank">recycling industry</a>. The world generates over 2 billion tons of waste annually, and this figure is </span><a href="https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/ba7feea4-0abe-59fb-bc60-ce6b60eb1ceb" target="_blank">expected to rise to nearly 4 billion tons by 2050</a><span>. Intuitively, trash collection seems like a job that hits all the Ds. </span><span>Going through our worksheet, we confirm that globally, workers in this industry </span><a href="https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/wp-solutions/2024-123/default.html" target="_blank">face</a><span> </span><a href="https://ilostat.ilo.org/beyond-the-bin-decent-work-deficits-in-the-waste-management-and-recycling-industry/" target="_blank">significant</a><span> </span><a href="https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/dbdown/ch" target="_blank">health hazards</a><span> (dangerous), and waste collection is </span><a href="https://occupational-prestige.github.io/opratings/opcrosswalk.html" target="_blank">ranked</a><span> as a </span><a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43615-021-00056-7" target="_blank">low-status job</a><span> (dirty), although interestingly, many workers </span><a href="https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031921-024847" target="_blank">take pride</a><span> in </span><a href="https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012420-091423" target="_blank">providing this essential service</a><span>.</span></p><p>The job is also repetitive, but there are aspects that make it <em>not dull</em>. Specifically, workers cite the <a href="https://academic.macmillan.com/academictrade/9780374534271/pickinguponthestreetsandbehindthetruckswiththesanitationworkersofnewyorkcity/" target="_blank">day-to-day interaction with their coworkers</a> (which includes extensive insider vocabulary, work hacks, and mutual aid groups) and <a href="https://www.routledge.com/Collecting-Garbage-Dirty-Work-Clean-Jobs-Proud-People/Perry/p/book/9780765804105" target="_blank">task variety</a> as two of the most enjoyable aspects of the job. Task variety includes inspecting their vehicle and equipment, driving their truck, coordinating with crew members, lifting bins and bags, detecting incorrect sorting of waste, and unloading at the end destination.</p><p>This finding matters, because some types of robotic solutions will eliminate the parts of the job that workers most appreciate. For instance, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/wp-solutions/2024-123/default.html" target="_blank">recommends the adoption of automated side loader trucks and collision avoidance systems</a>. This innovation increases safety, which is great, but it also results in a sole worker operating a joystick in a cab, surrounded by sensor and camera surveillance.</p><p>Instead, we should challenge ourselves to think of solutions that make jobs safer without making them terrible in a different way. To do this, we need to understand all aspects of what makes a job dull, dirty, or dangerous (or not.) Our framework aims to facilitate this understanding.</p><p>Finally, it’s important to note that <a href="https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1349822.1349827" target="_blank">DDD is only one of many possible approaches</a> to classify what work might be better served by robots–there are lots of ways we could think about which types of tasks or jobs to automate (e.g., economic impact, or environmental sustainability). Given the popularity of DDD in robotics, we chose this common phrase as a starting point. We would love to see more work in this space, whether it’s data collection on DDD itself, or the creation of other frameworks.</p><p>At <a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/marco-hutter-ai-institute" target="_blank">RAI</a>, we believe that the fusion of robotics and social sciences opens a whole new world of information, perspectives, opportunities, and value. It fosters a culture of curiosity and mutual learning, and allows us to create actionable tools for anyone in robotics who cares about societal impact.</p><div class="horizontal-rule"></div><a href="https://rai-inst.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Dull-Dirty-Dangerous.pdf" target="_blank">Dull, Dirty, Dangerous: Understanding the Past, Present, and Future of a Key Motivation for Robotics</a>, by <span>Nozomi Nakajima, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Caitrin Lynch, and Kate Darling from the RAI Institute, was presented at </span>the 21st ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) in Edinburgh, Scotland. Reference: https://ift.tt/8AF0qpi

Agentic AI for Robot Teams


<img src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/johns-hopkins-whiting-school-of-engineering-logo-with-shield-emblem.png?id=66700256&width=980"/><br/><br/><p>This presentation highlights recent efforts at the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory to advance agentic AI for collaborative robotic teams. It begins by framing the core challenges of enabling autonomy, coordination, and adaptability across heterogeneous systems, then introduces a scalable architecture designed to support agentic behaviors in multi-robot environments. The talk concludes with key challenges encountered and practical lessons learned from ongoing research and development.</p><p><span>Key learnings</span></p><ul><li>Provides an introduction to LLM-based AI Agents</li><li><span>Describes an approach to applying LLM-based AI Agents to robotic teams</span></li><li><span>Provides demonstrations of the approach running in hardware with a heterogeneous team of robots</span></li><li>Presents lessons learned and future work in this area</li></ul><div><a href="https://events.bizzabo.com/867156" target="_blank">Download this free whitepaper now!</a></div> Reference: https://events.bizzabo.com/867156

Friday, May 15, 2026

Striking New Views of the First Atomic Bomb Test


<img src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/photo-of-the-earliest-instant-of-the-first-atomic-explosion-is-seen-as-a-grayish-white-semi-sphere-against-a-black-background.jpg?id=66722347&width=1245&height=700&coordinates=9%2C0%2C10%2C0"/><br/><br/><div class="intro-text"><em><em>Editor’s note: If you’d like to pinpoint the instant when the world entered the nuclear age, 5:29:45 a.m. Mountain War Time on 16 July 1945, is an excellent choice. That was the moment when human beings first unleashed the power of the nucleus in an immense, blinding ball of fire above a gloomy stretch of desert in the Jornada del Muerto basin in New Mexico. Emily Seyl’s </em></em><span>Trinity: An Illustrated History of the World’s First Atomic Test</span><em><em> (The University of Chicago Press) offers hundreds of startlingly vivid photographs of the <a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-atomic-fortress-that-time-forgot" target="_blank">Manhattan Project</a> that emerged from a 20-year restoration effort. This excerpt and the accompanying photos record the massive effort to capture the awesome detonation of “the Gadget.”</em></em></div><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image rm-float-left rm-resized-container rm-resized-container-25" data-rm-resized-container="25%" style="float: left;"> <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/T/bo269844812.html"></a><a class="shortcode-media-lightbox__toggle shortcode-media-controls__button material-icons" style="background: gray;" title="Select for lightbox">aspect_ratio</a><img alt="Book cover \u201cTrinity\u201d showing atomic blast reflected in a camera lens." class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="076f679d205fcf6e00c0b72162968525" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="096a0" loading="lazy" src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/book-cover-u201ctrinity-u201d-showing-atomic-blast-reflected-in-a-camera-lens.jpg?id=66723097&width=980"/><small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">Reprinted with permission from <a href="https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/T/bo269844812.html" target="_blank">Trinity: An Illustrated History of the World’s First Atomic Test</a> by Emily Seyl with contributions by Alan B. Carr, published by The University of Chicago Press. © 2026 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</small></p><p class="drop-caps"><strong>In the North 10,000</strong> photography bunker, Berlyn Brixner was listening to the countdown on a loudspeaker, his head inside a turret loaded with cameras and film. He was one of the only people instructed to look toward the blast—through his welder’s glasses—ready to follow the path of the fireball as it launched into the sky. The two Mitchell movie cameras at his station would deliver the best footage to come of the Trinity test, used by Los Alamos scientists to make some of the first measurements of the effects of a nuclear explosion.</p><div class="rm-embed embed-media"><div class="flourish-embed flourish-chart" data-src="story/3675514?602891"><script src="https://public.flourish.studio/resources/embed.js"></script><noscript><img alt="visualization" src="https://public.flourish.studio/story/3675514/thumbnail" width="100%"/></noscript></div></div><p><span>When the detonators fired, the cameras captured what Brixner could not have seen—the very first light of a violent, silent sea of energy unfurling into the basin. As 32 blocks of high explosives erupted all together, their incredible force surged inward toward the sleeping <a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/perils-of-plutonium" target="_blank">plutonium</a> core, compressing the dense sphere of metal instantaneously from all sides and bringing its atoms impossibly close together. A carefully timed burst of neutrons sowed momentary, uncontrolled chaos, and then, as quickly as it began, the fission chain reaction ended. Footage from a high-speed Fastax camera in Brixner’s bunker, shot through a thick glass porthole, shows a translucent orb bursting through the darkness less than a hundredth of a second after detonation, as a rush of heat, light, and matter blew apart the Gadget.</span></p><div class="rm-embed embed-media"><div class="flourish-embed flourish-chart" data-src="story/3676614?602891"><script src="https://public.flourish.studio/resources/embed.js"></script><noscript><img alt="visualization" src="https://public.flourish.studio/story/3676614/thumbnail" width="100%"/></noscript></div></div><p><span>When the brightness faded enough for witnesses to make out ground zero, they saw a wall of dust rise up around a brilliant, shape-shifting, multicolored ball of flames—forming a fiery cloud that shot into the sky atop a twisting stream of debris. The camera footage tells a story no less dramatic but hundreds of times more intricate, preserving the moment for scientists to return to again and again to measure and describe the behavior of the fireball and other visible effects with exacting detail. On balance, the photography effort was a huge success, despite only 11 of the 52 cameras producing satisfactory images. By arranging those cameras at intentionally staggered distances, complementary angles, and with a broad spectrum of frame rates and focal lengths, the Spectrographic and Photographic Measurements Group was able to piece together a remarkably complete picture of their subject.</span></p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image rm-float-left rm-resized-container rm-resized-container-25" data-rm-resized-container="25%" style="float: left;"> <img alt="Black and white photo of a thin man wearing soiled, baggy trousers and a white t-shirt standing in a doorway grasping the handle of a small but heavy box." class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="dd0ec2aa5cf0edcd1d29e0035cbb65cd" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="818b6" loading="lazy" src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/black-and-white-photo-of-a-thin-man-wearing-soiled-baggy-trousers-and-a-white-t-shirt-standing-in-a-doorway-grasping-the-handle.jpg?id=66729941&width=980"> <small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">On 12 July 1945, Herbert Lehr, a U.S. Army sergeant and electrical engineer assigned to Los Alamos, delivered the plutonium core to the McDonald ranch house, where the bomb was assembled. </small><small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit...">Los Alamos National Laboratory</small></img></p><p><span>According to the group’s leader, Julian Mack, the more than 100,000 frames that were captured still “give no idea of the brightness, or of time and space scales.” Mack attributed fortune, as much as foresight, to the <a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/slideshow-a-nuclear-family-vacation" target="_blank">photographic record</a> that was made, especially during the earliest phase of the blast. Indeed, the explosion was several times more powerful than predicted, and the intensity of its effects overwhelmed many of the cameras and diagnostic instruments. The human observers were similarly overcome. “The shot was truly awe-inspiring,” said Norris Bradbury, the physicist who would succeed Robert Oppenheimer as director of Los Alamos. “Most experiences in life can be comprehended by prior experiences, but the atom bomb did not fit into any preconception possessed by anybody. The most startling feature was the intense light.”</span></p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image"> <img alt="A black and white photo of a man standing on a platform next to a cable-covered cylindrical device that is about the same height as he is." class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="8ae5d1fe3a98e33d0012121a56cf0216" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="86c62" loading="lazy" src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/a-black-and-white-photo-of-a-man-standing-on-a-platform-next-to-a-cable-covered-cylindrical-device-that-is-about-the-same-height.jpg?id=66729957&width=980"> <small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">Norris Bradbury, the physicist responsible for the final assembly of the Gadget, stands next to the partially assembled bomb at the top of the shot tower. The cables on the outside of the bomb would transmit the signals to trigger the synchronized detonations of conventional explosives, which would then create the inward-directed shock wave that would compress the bomb’s plutonium core. Bradbury would go on to succeed Robert Oppenheimer as director of Los Alamos on 17 October 1945.</small><small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit...">Los Alamos National Laboratory</small></img></p><p>It is a common sentiment that words and even pictures pale in comparison to the experience of the explosion. Even so, soldiers, scientists, and many other witnesses have added their firsthand accounts—often absorbing and poetic—to complement the trove of hard data collected during the test shot. They describe an intense and blinding brightness that filled the basin with daytime; an ominous, darkening cloud rearing its head in eerie silence; the wait for the invisible wave rushing out from the heart of the Gadget; and the mighty roar that arrived at last, in a thunder, and seemed never to leave. Physicist Isidor Isaac Rabi, watching from 20 miles away, remembered, “It blasted; it pounced; it bored its way right through you.”</p><div class="rm-embed embed-media"><div class="flourish-embed flourish-chart" data-src="story/3676642?602891"><script src="https://public.flourish.studio/resources/embed.js"></script><noscript><img alt="visualization" src="https://public.flourish.studio/story/3676642/thumbnail" width="100%"/></noscript></div></div><p>James Chadwick, head of the British contingent of scientists who joined the Manhattan Project, later said, “Although I had lived through this moment in my imagination many times during the past few years and everything happened almost as I had pictured it, the reality was shattering.”</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image"> <img alt="Sequence of black\u2011and\u2011white photos showing a nuclear explosion mushroom cloud forming" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="f85f05f43b0ce334d9bdce54d01fc01e" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="d7fd6" loading="lazy" src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/sequence-of-black-u2011and-u2011white-photos-showing-a-nuclear-explosion-mushroom-cloud-forming.png?id=66730306&width=980"> <small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">The blast, captured with an assortment of high-speed and motion-picture cameras, shows the fireball expanding between 25 milliseconds and 60 seconds, by which time the mushroom cloud is over 3 kilometers high.</small><small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit...">Los Alamos National Laboratory</small></img></p><p>And physicist George Kistiakowsky found himself certain that “at the end of the world—in the last millisecond of the Earth’s existence—the last human will see what we saw.” <span class="ieee-end-mark"></span></p> Reference: https://ift.tt/quTfVvr

Thursday, May 14, 2026

IEEE Society Helps Researchers Meet Their Next Corporate Backer


<img src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/a-man-giving-a-presentation-in-front-of-a-roundtable-audience.jpg?id=66734604&width=1245&height=700&coordinates=0%2C62%2C0%2C63"/><br/><br/><p>The <a href="https://www.comsoc.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">IEEE Communications Society (ComSoc)</a>’s <a href="https://www.comsoc.org/engagement-community/competitions/research-collaboration-pitch-session" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Research Collaboration Pitch Session</a> initiative is proving to be a catalyst for meaningful engagement between academic researchers and industry innovators. Launched last year, the program connects promising researchers with industry leaders who can offer them funding, mentorship, and connections to bring interesting ideas closer to real-world deployment.</p><p>Rather than relying on chance encounters at conferences, the pitch sessions create a focused environment. Five academic presenters share their work with five industry representatives, known as “innovation scouts”: senior leaders primarily chosen from ComSoc’s <a href="https://www.comsoc.org/about/comsoc-corporate-program" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Corporate Program partner companies</a> such as <a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/ieee-xplore-ericsson-tech-review" target="_self">Ericsson</a>, <a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/fhe-intel" target="_self">Intel</a>, <a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/ieee-and-keysight-team-up-to-teach-kids-about-electronics-2668966742" target="_self">Keysight</a>, and <a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/nokia-bell-labs-new-headquarters" target="_self">Nokia</a>. The curated format ensures that each idea receives dedicated attention from professionals who are seeking new concepts aligned with their organization’s priorities.</p><p>The initiative was launched in November at the <a href="https://mecom2025.ieee-mecom.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">IEEE Middle East Conference on Communications and Networking</a> (MECOM) in Cairo and appeared in December at the <a href="https://globecom2025.ieee-globecom.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">IEEE Global Communications Conference</a> (GLOBECOM) in Taipei, Taiwan.</p><h2>AI-driven communication network</h2><p>One of the most compelling outcomes came from the inaugural session in Cairo. <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/angela-waithaka-6b572124a/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Angela Waithaka</a>, a student member and biomedical engineering student at <a href="https://www.ku.ac.ke/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Kenyatta University</a>, in Nairobi, Kenya, presented her “AI-Driven Predictive Communication Networks for Enhanced Performance in Resource-Constrained Environments” paper. You can <a href="https://ieeetv.ieee.org/channels/communications/research-collaboration-pitch-session-ieee-mecom-2025" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">view her presentation along with others</a> on <a href="https://ieee.tv" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">IEEE.tv</a>.</p><p>Waithaka’s research tackles a critical challenge: Next-generation communication systems increasingly rely on artificial intelligence and machine learning, yet most existing architectures consume abundant computational and energy resources, which are not always present in developing regions.</p><p>Waithaka proposed lightweight, adaptive AI/machine learning models capable of delivering predictive, reliable communication performance even under tight resource constraints.</p><p>Her vision resonated with <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/richie-leo/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Ruiqi “Richie” Liu</a>, a master researcher at <a href="https://www.zte.com.cn/global/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">ZTE</a> in China. ZTE is a global leader in integrated information and communication technology solutions. Liu says he recognized the relevance Waithaka’s proposal had to his company’s work with the <a href="https://www.itu.int/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">International Telecommunication Union</a>. He invited her to establish an ITU account so she could participate in the organization’s meetings discussing global telecommunications standardization projects—which would elevate her work to an international stage.</p><h2>Simplifying data center protocols</h2><p>The momentum continued at GLOBECOM. Among the presenters was <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/nirmala-shenoy-94477299/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Nirmala Shenoy</a>, a professor at the <a href="https://www.rit.edu/directory/nxsvks-nirmala-shenoy" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Rochester Institute of Technology</a>, in New York. Shenoy, an IEEE member, spoke on the topic of <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCMZ2YP9TAo" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">simplifying data center network protocols</a><em><em>.</em></em> She highlighted the growing complexity of the critical networks, which underpin cloud services, enterprise IT, and emerging AI workloads.</p><p>Shenoy’s focus on reducing protocol complexity while maintaining scalability, resilience, and low latency caught the attention of an innovation scout from <a href="https://www.nokia.com/es_int/nokia-en-espana/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Nokia</a>, who heads its <a href="https://extendedrealitylab.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">eXtended Reality Lab</a> in Madrid. He found the key person at Nokia for Shenoy to connect with to discuss her research, and it led her to record a video for the company detailing her approach and its potential applications.</p><h2>A model for accelerating innovation</h2><p>The early success stories demonstrate the power of intentional, structured engagement. By bringing researchers and industry leaders together in a format designed for discovery, ComSoc is helping accelerate innovation and expand opportunities for collaboration. The pitch sessions are not merely conference events; they are becoming a <a href="https://ieeetv.ieee.org/ns/ieeetvdl/2026/ComSoc_MECOM_2025_Pitch_Session_Sizzle_v1.mp4" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">bridge</a> between academic creativity and industry implementation.</p><p>This year sessions will be held during the <a href="https://icc2026.ieee-icc.org/program/research-pitch-collaboration-session" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">IEEE International Conference on Communications</a> in Glasgow from 24 to 28 May, and more are scheduled during the <a href="https://www.comsoc.org/conferences-events/ieee-international-mediterranean-conference-communications-and-networking-2026#:~:text=The%20conference%20is%20held%20annually%20in%20various,technical%20papers%20deadline%20is%20February%2026%2C%202026." rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">IEEE International Mediterranean Conference on Communications and Networking</a> in Sardinia from 6 to 9 July, and at GLOBECOM in Macau from 7 to 11 December.</p><p>As the program continues to grow, it could become a signature ComSoc initiative, one that strengthens the research ecosystem, supports emerging talent, and ensures that promising ideas find pathways to real-world impact.</p> Reference: https://ift.tt/KYxmSbw

Cisco announces record revenue and 4,000 layoffs in the same day


<p>Following a quarter in which his company delivered record revenue, Cisco CEO Chuck Robbins announced that the company's latest round of layoffs begins today.</p> <p>In a <a href="https://blogs.cisco.com/news/our-path-forward">blog post</a> yesterday, Robbins was quick to boast that Cisco’s fiscal Q3 2026 earnings saw revenue increase 12 percent year-over-year to $15.8 billion. He told employees that he and the rest of Cisco’s executive leadership team “could not be prouder of the growth you have all delivered for Cisco.”</p> <p>But that pride could apparently not save the company’s successful employees from unemployment.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/05/cisco-announces-record-revenue-and-4000-layoffs-in-the-same-day/">Read full article</a></p> <p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/05/cisco-announces-record-revenue-and-4000-layoffs-in-the-same-day/#comments">Comments</a></p> Reference : https://ift.tt/BxVstq2

Accelerating Chipmaking Innovation for the Energy-Efficient AI Era


<img src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/modern-glass-office-complex-labeled-epic-center-with-trees-and-walkways-outside.jpg?id=66659351&width=1245&height=700&coordinates=0%2C37%2C0%2C38"/><br/><br/><p><em>This sponsored article is brought to you by <a href="https://www.appliedmaterials.com/us/en.html" target="_blank">Applied Materials</a>.</em></p><p>At pivotal moments in history, progress has required more than individual brilliance. The most consequential breakthroughs — such as those achieved under the Human Genome Project — required a new operating paradigm: Concentrate the world’s best talent around a single mission, establish a common platform, share critical infrastructure, and collapse feedback loops. When stakes are high and timelines are compressed, sequential and siloed innovation simply cannot keep pace.</p><p>Today’s AI era is creating an engineering race with similar demands. Every company is pushing to deliver higher-performance AI systems, faster. But performance is no longer defined by compute alone. AI workloads are increasingly dominated by the movement of data: In many cases, moving bits consumes as much — or more — energy than compute itself. As a result, reducing energy per bit can extend system‑level performance alongside gains in peak compute.</p><p><span>The path to energy‑efficient AI therefore runs through system‑level engineering, spanning three tightly interconnected domains:</span></p><ul><li><strong>Logic</strong>, where performance per watt depends on efficient transistor switching, low‑loss power, and signal delivery through dense wiring stacks.</li><li><strong>Memory</strong>, where surging bandwidth and capacity demands expose the memory wall, with processor capability advancing faster than memory access.</li><li><strong>Advanced packaging</strong>, where 3D integration, chiplet architectures, and high‑density interconnects bring compute and memory closer together — enabling system designs monolithic scaling can no longer sustain.</li></ul><p>These domains can no longer be optimized independently. Gains in logic efficiency stall without sufficient memory bandwidth. Advances in memory bandwidth fall short if packaging cannot deliver proximity within thermal and mechanical constraints. Packaging, in turn, is constrained by the precision of both front‑end device fabrication and back‑end integration processes.</p><p>In the angstrom era, the hardest problems arise at the boundaries — between compute and memory in the package, front‑end and back‑end integration, and the tightly coupled process steps needed for precise 3D fabrication. And it is precisely this boundary‑driven complexity where the traditional innovation model breaks down.</p><h2>The Traditional R&D Workflow Is Too Slow for Angstrom‑Era AI</h2><p>For decades, the semiconductor industry’s R&D model has resembled a relay race. Capabilities are developed in one part of the ecosystem, handed off downstream through integration and manufacturing, evaluated by chip and system designers, and only then fed back for the next iteration. That model worked when progress was dominated by relatively modular steps that could be scaled independently and simply dropped into the manufacturing flow.</p><p>But the AI timeline has upended these rules. At angstrom‑scale dimensions, the physics enforces inescapable coupling across the entire stack: materials choices shape integration schemes; integration defines design rules; design rules dictate power delivery; wiring sets thermal budgets; and thermals ultimately constrain packaging scaling. System architects simply cannot wait 10–15 years for each major semiconductor technology inflection to mature.</p><p class="pull-quote">Representing a roughly $5 billion investment, EPIC is the largest commitment to advanced semiconductor equipment R&D in U.S. history.</p><p>A long‑term perspective is essential to align materials innovation with emerging device architectures — and to develop the tools and processes required to integrate both with manufacturable precision. At <a href="https://www.appliedmaterials.com/" target="_blank">Applied Materials</a>, together with our customers, we are charting a course across the next 3–4 generations, extending as far as 10 years down the roadmap.</p><p>The angstrom era demands that we break down silos and bring together the industry’s best minds — from leading companies to leading academic institutions. If the problem is coupled, the solution must be coupled. If the timeline is compressed, the learning loop must be compressed. It’s not enough to just innovate — we must innovate <em>how </em>we innovate.</p><h2>EPIC: A Center and Platform for High‑Velocity Co‑Innovation</h2><p>This is the challenge that Applied Materials EPIC Center is designed to solve.</p><p>Representing a roughly US $5 billion investment, EPIC is the largest commitment to advanced semiconductor equipment R&D in U.S. history. When it opens in 2026, it will deliver state‑of‑the‑art cleanroom capabilities built from the ground up to shorten the path from early‑stage research to full‑scale manufacturing. But the facilities are only one component of the model. EPIC is also a platform, an operating system for high-velocity co‑innovation that revolutionizes how ideas move from the lab to the fab.</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image"> <img alt="Diagram comparing traditional and EPIC chip innovation timelines showing 2x faster path" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="96015591a65db61b8276debbf07572cd" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="65b06" loading="lazy" src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/diagram-comparing-traditional-and-epic-chip-innovation-timelines-showing-2x-faster-path.png?id=66661836&width=980"/> <small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">EPIC is a platform, an operating system for high-velocity co‑innovation that revolutionizes how ideas move from the lab to the fab.</small><small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit...">Applied Materials</small></p><p><span>The EPIC model compresses the traditional workflow. Customer engineers work side‑by‑side with Applied technologists from day one — moving beyond isolated process optimization and downstream handoffs. Within a shared, secure environment, EPIC tightly integrates atomistic modeling, test vehicles, process development, validation, and metrology feedback. Constraints that once surfaced late in development are identified and addressed early.</span></p><p>The result is a potentially 2x faster path that benefits the entire ecosystem under one roof:</p><ul><li><strong>Chipmakers </strong>gain earlier access to Applied’s R&D portfolio, faster learning cycles, and accelerated transfer of next‑generation technologies into high‑volume manufacturing.<strong></strong></li><li><strong>Ecosystem partners</strong> gain earlier access to advanced manufacturing technology and collaboration opportunities that expand what is possible through materials innovation.<strong></strong></li><li><strong>Academic institutions </strong>gain opportunities to strengthen the lab‑to‑fab pipeline and help develop future semiconductor talent.<strong></strong></li></ul><p>Building on decades of co‑development, we are reinventing the innovation pipeline with our partners across logic, memory, and advanced packaging to deliver the next leap in energy‑efficient AI.</p><h2>Accelerating Advanced Logic</h2><p>Logic remains the engine of AI compute. In the angstrom era, however, system‑level gains are increasingly constrained by power and energy. Extending AI performance now depends on architectures that deliver more performance per watt — accelerating the move to 3D devices such as gate‑all‑around (GAA) transistors, which boost density within a compact footprint while preserving power efficiency.</p><div class="ieee-sidebar-large"><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image"> <img alt="Evolution from FinFET to GAA, backside power, isolated GAA, and CFET transistors" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="d66597919442799fa477cfc8aafcaa01" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="dd920" loading="lazy" src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/evolution-from-finfet-to-gaa-backside-power-isolated-gaa-and-cfet-transistors.jpg?id=66659734&width=980"/> <small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">Architectures that deliver more performance per watt are accelerating the move to 3D devices such as gate‑all‑around (GAA) transistors, and further out, complementary FETs (CFETs), which push density scaling even more.</small><small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit...">Applied Materials</small></p></div><p><span>These architectural shifts are unfolding at unprecedented scale, with the logic roadmap already extending beyond first‑generation GAA toward more advanced designs. One key example is GAA with backside power delivery, which relocates thick power lines to the backside of the wafer, reducing resistive losses and freeing front‑side routing for tighter logic cell integration. Another example brings adjacent GAA PMOS and NMOS transistors closer together while inserting a dielectric isolation wall between them to minimize electrical interference. Further out, complementary FETs (CFETs) push density scaling even more by stacking PMOS and NMOS devices directly atop one another.</span></p><p>While these architectures deliver compelling gains in performance per watt and logic density without relying solely on tighter lithography, they significantly raise integration complexity. Manufacturing a single GAA device today can involve more than 2,000 tightly interdependent process steps. At the same time, wiring stacks continue to grow taller and denser to connect these advanced logic devices. Modern leading‑edge GPUs now in development pack more than 300 billion transistors into an area little larger than a postage stamp, interconnected by over 2,000 miles of wiring.</p><div class="ieee-sidebar-large"><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image"> <img alt="Diagram of advanced AI chip showing layered wiring and 3D stack of copper interconnects." class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="0ac1f5771ed9d3d6daa81708a2feba6d" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="5adf6" loading="lazy" src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/diagram-of-advanced-ai-chip-showing-layered-wiring-and-3d-stack-of-copper-interconnects.jpg?id=66659736&width=980"/> <small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">Modern leading‑edge GPUs now in development pack more than 300 billion transistors into an area little larger than a postage stamp, interconnected by over 2,000 miles of wiring.</small><small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit...">Applied Materials</small></p></div><p><span>At this level of complexity, the process steps used to create these precise 3D devices and wiring stacks cannot be optimized independently. Design and process must evolve in lockstep, and materials innovation and fabrication methods must advance alongside device architecture. EPIC’s co‑innovation model is designed to accelerate exactly this convergence — enabling logic compute to continue advancing the frontiers of AI at the pace the roadmap demands.</span></p><h2>Powering the Memory Roadmap</h2><p>At the same time, the AI computing era is fundamentally reshaping how data is generated, moved, and processed — making memory technologies, especially DRAM, central to delivering the energy‑efficient performance AI systems require. As models grow larger and more data‑hungry, the DRAM roadmap is shifting toward architectures that deliver higher density, greater bandwidth, and faster access per watt.</p><div class="ieee-sidebar-large"><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image"> <img alt="Diagram of DRAM cell scaling from 8F\u00b2 to stacked 3D DRAM architecture." class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="4a15a67c9e3fc19ccc59866774ef7f6c" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="107e7" loading="lazy" src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/diagram-of-dram-cell-scaling-from-8f-u00b2-to-stacked-3d-dram-architecture.jpg?id=66659766&width=980"/> <small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">At the DRAM cell level, AI performance requirements are driving a transition from 6F² buried‑channel array transistors (BCAT) to more compact 4F², and beyond that, architectures that move past what 2D scaling alone can deliver. </small><small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit...">Applied Materials</small></p></div><p>At the DRAM cell level, this shift is driving a transition from 6F² buried‑channel array transistors (BCAT) to more compact 4F² architectures, which orient the transistor vertically to boost density and reduce chip area. Looking beyond 4F², sustaining gains in performance per watt will require moving past what 2D scaling alone can deliver. The industry is therefore turning to 3D DRAM, stacking memory cells vertically to add capacity within a constrained footprint. As these structures grow taller and aspect ratios intensify, high-mobility materials engineering in three dimensions becomes increasingly critical to performance and reliability.</p><p>Beyond the memory cell array, another powerful lever for DRAM scaling is shrinking the peripheral circuitry, which includes logic transistors and interconnect wiring. One emerging approach places select periphery functions beneath the DRAM array by bonding two wafers — one optimized for the DRAM cells and the other for CMOS logic — using multiple wiring layers.</p><div class="ieee-sidebar-large"><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image"> <img alt="Diagram of transistor and interconnect technology progressing to FinFET and advanced Cu links" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="6c6c6ebbda58b4b241b326cf5f2514b5" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="f2f52" loading="lazy" src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/diagram-of-transistor-and-interconnect-technology-progressing-to-finfet-and-advanced-cu-links.jpg?id=66659784&width=980"/> <small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">Beyond the memory cell array, another powerful lever for DRAM scaling is shrinking the peripheral circuitry, which includes logic transistors and interconnect wiring.</small><small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit...">Applied Materials</small></p></div><p>In parallel, DRAM performance is being extended by leveraging logic‑proven enhancers in the memory periphery. These include mobility boosters such as embedded silicon germanium and stress films, along with wiring upgrades like improved low‑k dielectrics and advanced copper interconnects. Memory manufacturers are also transitioning periphery transistors from planar devices to FinFET architectures, following the logic roadmap to further improve I/O speed. These valuable inflections are central to EPIC’s mission — where they can be co-developed and rapidly validated for next‑generation memory systems.</p><h2>Driving System Scaling With Advanced Packaging</h2><p>As data movement becomes the dominant energy cost in AI systems, advanced packaging has emerged as a critical lever for improving system‑level efficiency—shortening interconnect distances, increasing bandwidth density, and reducing the power required to move data between logic and memory.</p><div class="ieee-sidebar-medium"><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image rm-float-left rm-resized-container rm-resized-container-25" data-rm-resized-container="25%" style="float: left;"> <img alt="Diagram of AI accelerator with surrounding HBM chips and enlarged stacked HBM memory." class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="57ca5bd0a4fb3c9caafdd046322814ee" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="8d42b" loading="lazy" src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/diagram-of-ai-accelerator-with-surrounding-hbm-chips-and-enlarged-stacked-hbm-memory.jpg?id=66659903&width=980"/> <small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">The rise of 3D packages such as high‑bandwidth memory (HBM) underscores why advanced packaging is becoming central to the AI era.</small><small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit...">Applied Materials</small></p></div><p>High‑bandwidth memory (HBM) marks a major inflection along this path. By stacking DRAM dies — scaling to 16 layers and beyond — and placing memory much closer to the processor, HBM enables rapid access to ever‑larger working datasets. This delivers step‑function gains in both bandwidth and energy efficiency.</p><p>More broadly, the rise of 3D packages such as HBM underscores why advanced packaging is becoming central to the AI era. Packaging now addresses system‑level constraints that logic and memory device scaling alone can no longer overcome. It also enables a move away from monolithic systems‑on‑chip toward chiplet‑based architectures, as AI workloads increasingly demand flexible designs that combine logic, memory, and specialized accelerators optimized for specific tasks.</p><p>A vital technology powering this roadmap is hybrid bonding. With interconnect pitches approaching those of on‑chip wiring, conventional bumps and microbumps run into fundamental limits in density, power, and signal integrity. Hybrid bonding removes these barriers by allowing dramatically higher interconnect and I/O density, supporting a broad range of chiplet architectures — from memory stacking to tighter compute‑memory integration.</p><div class="ieee-sidebar-large"><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image"> <img alt="Colorful 3D cross-section of a stacked computer chip package with connectors" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="803f8a53c6b07244ec4f34b4165fd65e" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="623bc" loading="lazy" src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/colorful-3d-cross-section-of-a-stacked-computer-chip-package-with-connectors.jpg?id=66659905&width=980"/> <small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">EPIC tackles high‑value advanced‑packaging challenges through early, parallel co‑innovation across materials, integration, and manufacturing.</small><small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit...">Applied Materials</small></p></div><p>As bonded structures like HBM stacks grow larger and more complex, warpage control, die placement, stack alignment, and thermal management become first‑order challenges. EPIC tackles these and other high‑value advanced‑packaging challenges through early, parallel co‑innovation across materials, integration, and manufacturing.</p><h2>Bringing It All Together</h2><p>Across logic, memory, and advanced packaging, our industry faces an ambitious roadmap that promises significant gains in energy efficiency for AI systems. But realizing that potential demands breakthrough materials innovation at a time when feature sizes are shrinking, interfaces are multiplying, and process interdependencies are escalating. These challenges cannot be solved on 10–15‑year timelines under the traditional relay‑race model. We must break down silos, align earlier across the ecosystem, and parallelize learning to keep pace with AI’s demands.</p><p>In the AI era, progress will be defined by the speed at which lightbulb moments turn into manufacturing and commercialization reality. The only viable path forward is a new innovation model — and EPIC is how we are driving it.</p> Reference: https://ift.tt/Z5YuPz7

Texas AG sues Meta over claims that WhatsApp doesn't provide end-to-end encryption

<p>The Texas Attorney General has sued Meta over allegations that the company’s WhatsApp messenger, used ...