Wednesday, November 4, 2026

Binance says hackers who stole billions in crypto spent months planning heist


<p>The hackers who stole billions of dollars in cryptocurrency from the Binance exchange spent months working on the theft and used both social engineering and novel malware in the process, the company said Tuesday.</p> <p>The heist, which both the <a href="https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/cyber/alerts/2026/north-korea-responsible-for-6-billion-binance-attack">FBI</a> and the TRM Security firm attributed to North Korean actors, initially targeted $6.34 billion in cryptocurrency from Binance wallets. The exchange has since frozen or intercepted $2.85 billion of that sum. Binance said it has set aside funds required to cover the loss and provided <a href="https://www.binance.com/en/proof-of-reserves">this link</a> to a Proof of Reserves page. The $6.34 billion represents the <a href="https://www.trmlabs.com/resources/blog/north-korea-steals-usd-6-36-billion-from-binance-in-the-largest-hack-in-history">biggest sum</a> ever targeted in a cryptocurrency theft.</p> <h2>Advanced persistent threat</h2> <p>Binance <a href="https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/384312159834579">said</a> the people behind the heist began no later than June and continued until last Thursday, when they successfully compromised an engineer's laptop and withdrew assets from several wallets. Like just about every organization that suffers a public, high-consequence hack, Binance said the threat actor was sophisticated and resourceful.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/11/binance-says-hackers-who-stole-billions-in-crypto-spent-months-planning-heist/">Read full article</a></p> <p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/11/binance-says-hackers-who-stole-billions-in-crypto-spent-months-planning-heist/#comments">Comments</a></p> Reference : https://ift.tt/O0NlRp2

Tuesday, November 3, 2026

IEEE Computer Society Chapter Offers Webinars With Industry Experts


<img src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/illustration-of-people-reaching-out-of-their-computers-to-interact-with-each-other-during-a-video-meeting.jpg?id=68577162&width=1200&height=600&coordinates=0%2C312%2C0%2C313"/><br/><br/><p>To help engineers <a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/ieee-professional-development-suite" target="_self">keep up with emerging technologies</a> such as AI, cloud computing, and sustainable infrastructure, and learn how they can be applied in practice, the <a href="https://www.computer.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">IEEE Computer Society</a>’s <a href="https://www.facebook.com/cisieee/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Central Indiana Chapter</a> recently launched its Tech Talk Series.</p><p>The live webinar series connects IEEE members, undergrad and graduate students, and engineering professionals from <a href="https://r4.ieee.org/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">IEEE Region 4</a> with industry practitioners. The monthly sessions have covered <a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/6-guidelines-governing-ai" target="_self">AI governance</a> and security, agentic systems, and related topics. The sessions featured speakers from <a href="https://www.apple.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Apple</a>, software company <a href="https://tavant.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Tavant</a>, and cybersecurity concern <a href="https://www.zscaler.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Zscaler</a>.</p><p>Upcoming sessions and registration details are available on the <a href="https://r4.ieee.org/events/category/virtual-events/month/?tribe-bar-search=Indiana" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">IEEE Region 4 virtual events calendar</a>.</p><h2>Technical discussions grounded in engineering</h2><p>Rather than presenting on emerging technologies only at a conceptual level, speakers discussed the design decisions behind specific tools and systems, how the systems are structured, and implementation challenges. They also shared lessons learned from using the tools in their daily work.</p><p>Sessions also include technical walkthroughs and practical examples.</p><p>The live format allows attendees to discuss and compare their approaches when evaluating and implementing new technologies with those used by other organizations.</p><h2>Extending access through a virtual format</h2><p>The organizers chose to make the series virtual so that chapter members and other attendees could participate in technical discussions with engineers from major technology companies and eliminate the need to travel.</p><p>For young professionals, the sessions connect what they’ve learned in a classroom with the realities of the workplace.</p><p class="pull-quote"><span>Technical programs such as the Tech Talk Series give professionals and students access to expertise, help create connections across career levels, and make important engineering discussions available to a broader community.</span></p><p>Attendees learn how practitioners approach projects such as system architecture, reliability, security, governance, and product delivery. For experienced professionals, the talks offer a forum to examine new ways of designing, securing, and operating software systems, and compare technical approaches. They can ask questions relevant to systems being evaluated or deployed within their organization.</p><h2>Examining governed AI agents</h2><p>The most recent webinar, Feeding and Fencing AI Agents: Engineering Governed Agentic Systems on Real-Time Data, featured <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/gajendrababu" target="_blank">Gajendra Babu Thokala</a>, a senior engineering leader at Apple in Seattle.</p><p>The IEEE senior member explained how teams can move beyond adding isolated AI features to applications and instead build governed AI-agent systems that use real-time business data to complete multistep business workflows.</p><p>Another recent session, Building AI Native Products: A Playbook for Agentic Systems, explored how products built around AI agents differ from traditional software. It also covered how agentic systems can help users complete multistep tasks and workflows. IEEE Senior Member <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/sandeep-shivam-51910232/" target="_blank">Sandeep Shivam</a>, a product and technology leader at Tavant in Dallas, led the webinar.</p><p>Those two sessions illustrate the series’ purpose: helping participants understand what a technology can do and what is required to use it responsibly.</p><h2>Building a continuing technical program</h2><p>Future sessions are being planned on areas including enterprise AI, software reliability, and responsible AI usage. In addition to speakers from technology companies, the chapter also plans to invite speakers from startups, universities, and research organizations.</p><p>Upcoming sessions are expected to cover cloud platforms, enterprise integrations, and the responsible development of AI systems. </p><p>Technical programs such as the Tech Talk Series give professionals and students access to expertise, help create connections across career levels, and make important engineering discussions available to a broader community.</p><p>Undergraduate and graduate students are invited to participate to gain exposure to technical decision-making and challenges encountered in professional engineering environments.</p> Reference: https://ift.tt/xEiIXey

UEFI bootkit infected fully patched Windows machines. Is Microsoft to blame?


<p>In 2023, malware tracked as BlackLotus became the first publicly documented in-the-wild UEFI bootkit capable of bypassing Secure Boot on fully updated Windows 11 systems. With the industry-wide chain-of-trust mechanism subverted, the malware was able to run malicious code before Windows was fully loaded and many security defenses were operational.</p> <p>Microsoft had already patched the vulnerability that BlackLotus exploited in 2022. In 2023 and 2024, Microsoft issued additional updates. The first added a new certificate that no longer trusted the vulnerable boot managers. The second provided the means to revoke trust in the digital certificate used to sign older vulnerable Windows boot managers. The organizations infected by the new bootkit, which is tracked under the name BlackX, had installed all of these patches. So how did they fall victim?</p> <h2>UEFI bootkit refresher</h2> <p>Before discussing the incident further, a brief review of BlackLotus and UEFI malware is in order. Short for <a href="https://uefi.org/specs/UEFI/2.10/01_Introduction.html">Unified Extensible Firmware Interface</a>, UEFI is firmware that runs immediately after a computer is turned on. One of its main jobs is to load system configuration settings, identify and initialize hardware components, and prepare the computer to start its OS.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/11/uefi-bootkit-infected-fully-patched-windows-machines-is-microsoft-to-blame/">Read full article</a></p> <p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/11/uefi-bootkit-infected-fully-patched-windows-machines-is-microsoft-to-blame/#comments">Comments</a></p> Reference : https://ift.tt/swUWAe8

Sunday, November 1, 2026

Guarding the Gates of Knowledge


<img src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/stacked-orange-documents-over-abstract-black-circuit-board-pattern.jpg?id=68537695&width=1200&height=800&coordinates=0%2C130%2C0%2C130"/><br/><br/><p>A recent scroll through social media got me thinking about trust. About half my feed was filled with AI slop that astute users would call out as being machine-generated, often to the embarrassment of the rube who unknowingly spread it and sometimes to the delight of the poster who shared it deliberately because they found it amusing or useful for sowing confusion.</p><p>Remember the good old days of GPT-3 when we could ask the chatbot anything and it would almost instantly and very confidently spit back a plausible but false answer? That’s when the word “hallucination” as applied to AI answers entered the lexicon. Six years and several versions of a few different chatbots later, I still can’t trust the answers I get, even though Claude or Gemini often do useful work for me. That’s the thing about current AI: Trust but verify. And verify you must.</p><p>Apply that maxim at scale to maintain the integrity of the scientific record and you get an idea of the challenge facing publishers of peer-reviewed scholarship. In “<a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-generated-scientific-papers" target="_blank">I Used AI to Fake a Scientific Paper</a>,” freelance writer and doctor of applied mathematics Benjamin Skuse tells the story of the human gatekeepers trying to beat back the rising tide of AI slop by attempting to get his own AI-generated papers past IEEE’s defenses.</p><p class="pull-quote">“He basically hit ‘run experiment’ and ‘write paper.’ And then he didn’t do a damn thing to it.” <strong>—Eliza Strickland</strong></p><p>As features and AI beat editor Eliza Strickland told me, Skuse was surprised at just how effortless it was to generate a paper that was more or less plausible and more or less science. For one of his experiments, “he basically hit ‘run experiment’ and ‘write paper,’” she said. “And then he didn’t do a damn thing to it. He just launched it into the maw of the publishing engine.”</p><p>Skuse discovered that the combination of IEEE’s human-review processes and research-integrity checker programs are currently keeping pace in what amounts to a cat-and-mouse game against people using free tools. But the more advanced LLMs are no longer making the same dumb mistakes the free versions do. That leaves publishers locked in an arms race between increasingly plausible slop and the systems aimed at detecting it.</p><p>Scholarly publishers aren’t the only ones trying to hold the line against slop. So is that global depository of human-generated knowledge, Wikipedia. For this month’s <a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/wikipedia-wikiproject-ai-writing-cleanup" target="_blank">Five Questions</a>, Strickland interviewed Ellia Lebleu, a founding member of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_AI_Cleanup" target="_blank">WikiProject AI Cleanup</a>, a volunteer effort to detect and delete AI-generated material from the platform. Lebleu’s team is confronting the same problem as commercial publishers, but with fewer people and fewer tools.</p><p>“Wikipedia is known as a repository of human-generated information, and they want to hold on to that,” says Strickland. “Who knows how long they’ll be able to do that.”</p><p>If we can’t collectively assume that the scientific record is trustworthy or that basic facts about the world are accurate, then our understanding of what is real unspools into <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger%27s_cat" target="_blank">uncertainty</a>. Perhaps that delights quantum scientists and the grifters who thrive in an information environment where there is no shared reality. But that uncertainty ultimately undermines trust in the institutions that exist to curate the corpus of human knowledge and to promote the advancement of science and technology for the benefit of humanity.</p><p>Or maybe in a world where AI is doing the science and writing the papers, it won’t matter whether or not humans trust the outputs. As Strickland put it, “Doesn’t it just feel crazy that we’ll have AI writing for other AIs at some point? We’ll just get left out of the loop.”</p> Reference: https://ift.tt/GvhB5rz

Saturday, October 31, 2026

When Electric Cars Were for Women


<img src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/black-and-white-photo-of-a-woman-standing-in-an-early-20th-century-car-next-to-an-upright-electrical-apparatus.jpg?id=68537019&width=1200&height=400&coordinates=0%2C500%2C0%2C501"/><br/><br/><p>At the turn of the last century, the automobile industry was still new and evolving rapidly. In 1898, there were about 50 carmakers in the United States. A decade later, that number had increased fivefold. In 1901, the companies produced 7,000 vehicles. By 1910, production had reached 181,000.</p><div class="rm-embed embed-media"><iframe height="110px" id="noa-web-audio-player" src="https://embed-player.newsoveraudio.com/v4?key=q5m19e&id=https://spectrum.ieee.org/early-electric-vehicles&bgColor=F5F5F5&color=1b1b1c&playColor=1b1b1c&progressBgColor=F5F5F5&progressBorderColor=bdbbbb&titleColor=1b1b1c&timeColor=1b1b1c&speedColor=1b1b1c&noaLinkColor=556B7D&noaLinkHighlightColor=FF4B00&feedbackButton=false" style="border: none" width="100%"></iframe></div><p><span>For several decades, electric cars vied with those powered by steam and internal combustion, and nobody was sure which technology would come out on top. Steam had the legacy of locomotive technology behind it but came with a risk of fire. Steam-powered vehicles could also become exceedingly hot, depending on the placement of the boiler and the steam piping. Both gasoline and electric cars faced logistical challenges: How far could you travel without refueling or charging? You could always throw an extra can of gasoline in the back of the car, but charging a battery involved more planning. The infrastructure for long-distance travel was not yet in place.</span></p><p>Before the invention of the electric starter in 1911, gasoline-powered engines had to be started with a hand crank; once running, they were loud and emitted noxious fumes. Fully electric vehicles, by contrast, were easy to start; you just turned on the main battery switch, often with a key, and there was no foul exhaust to deal with. </p><p>Electric carmakers looking for a way to differentiate their products decided that these attributes made their vehicles perfect for women. (Electric cars were also marketed to doctors so that they could make house calls in the middle of the night without waking the neighbors.) General Electric, which made car chargers based on <a href="https://heritagemuseumsandgardens.org/charging-ahead-merc-arc-rec/" target="_blank">mercury-arc rectifiers</a>, was so captivated by the idea of women driving electric cars that the company created a <a href="https://artsandculture.google.com/story/OwXBW0hRZDluIQ?hl=en" target="_blank">series of advertisements</a> featuring stylishly dressed women plugging in their cars and posing with their charging stations.</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image"> <img alt="Black and white photo of a woman standing between an early 20th century car and an electrical apparatus." class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="ce082e5767ff4f6ec9f161cf54f405ca" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="80d5d" loading="lazy" src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/black-and-white-photo-of-a-woman-standing-between-an-early-20th-century-car-and-an-electrical-apparatus.jpg?id=68537062&width=980"/> <small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">In ads for its electric car chargers, General Electric featured women using the equipment.</small><small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit..."><a href="https://nyheritage.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/p16694coll20/id/33/rec/38" target="_blank">miSci—Museum of Innovation and Science</a></small></p><p>A young woman named Fannie Goodnow was an early EV adopter. She owned a 1908 Bailey Victoria Phaeton, an open two-seater that really did look like a horseless carriage, and she used a GE mercury-arc rectifier to charge it. </p><h2>Who Invented the Mercury-Arc Rectifier?</h2><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image rm-float-left rm-resized-container rm-resized-container-25" data-rm-resized-container="25%" style="float: left;"> <img alt="Black and white photo of an older mustached white man wearing a hat and a winter coat. " class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="a403e37e937f9cab15436462cdde1c5b" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="d77e7" loading="lazy" src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/black-and-white-photo-of-an-older-mustached-white-man-wearing-a-hat-and-a-winter-coat.jpg?id=68537214&width=980"/> <small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">Electrical engineer Peter Cooper Hewitt invented the mercury vapor lamp, which became the basis for the mercury-arc rectifier used in car-charging systems. </small><small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit...">Bettmann/Getty Images</small></p><p>Electrical engineer <a href="https://www.ringwoodmanor.org/peter-cooper-hewitt.html" target="_blank">Peter Cooper Hewitt</a> is generally credited with the invention of the mercury-arc rectifier. During the first decade of the 20th century, Hewitt received several U.S. patents for electric lamps and other apparatus for transmitting and using electric currents. U.S. patents <a href="https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/14/53/af/25e40edaefe169/US968896.pdf" target="_blank">968,896</a> and <a href="https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/3a/ec/43/2d000ab50a0f86/US1163706.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">1,163,706</a>, granted to <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/1957/03/19/archives/percy-h-thomas-engineer-84-dies-exaide-of-federal-power-commission.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Percy H. Thomas</a>, advanced Hewitt’s designs. Thomas was chief electrician for the Cooper Hewitt Electric Co., which Hewitt had cofounded with George Westinghouse to manufacture and sell his lamps.</p><p>The mercury-arc rectifier functioned as a diode. In a car charger like the one Fannie Goodnow used, it converted alternating current from the power grid into direct current needed to charge the car’s battery. A small amount of liquid mercury contained in a glass tube would vaporize and glow as electricity passed through it. Coupled with the carbon anodes, the vapor allowed current to flow in only one direction. This unit took about 12 hours to charge a drained battery. </p><h2>A Carriage Maker Pivots to Electric Cars</h2><p>I couldn’t find any records as to why Fannie Goodnow opted for an electric car. But as a well-to-do woman living in the Boston area, she had more than a half dozen automobile producers to choose from. The one she chose was S.R. Bailey & Co. of Amesbury, Mass.</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image rm-float-left rm-resized-container rm-resized-container-25" data-rm-resized-container="25%" style="float: left;"> <img alt="Color photo of an electrical apparatus with a number of levers, meters, and cables, attached to a wooden stand " class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="0a3e626cf5b051d0adf7a62837cca583" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="3c816" loading="lazy" src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/color-photo-of-an-electrical-apparatus-with-a-number-of-levers-meters-and-cables-attached-to-a-wooden-stand.jpg?id=68537042&width=980"/> <small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">This early electric car charger used a mercury-arc rectifier to convert AC to DC.</small><small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit...">Heritage Museums & Gardens</small></p><p>According to Galen Handy, who maintains the <a href="https://earlyelectric.com/bailey.html" target="_blank">Early Electric Vehicles</a> website, Samuel Robinson Bailey started in the carriage and sleigh business as a teenager, winning a best-in-show prize at a carriage exhibition in Portland, Maine, in 1855. Bailey developed a reputation as an inventor and designed processes to streamline the manufacture of his vehicles. He went into business for himself in 1882. Just over a decade later, one of Bailey’s carriages won a gold medal at the 1893 World’s Columbian Exposition in Chicago.</p><p>Bailey’s son Edwin attended the exposition, where he likely would have seen a vision of the future: the Morrison electric wagon. This six-passenger, battery-powered vehicle ferried visitors and VIPs around the fairgrounds. It wasn’t long before automobiles began eating into the carriage business. In December 1906, with the carriage industry collapsing, S.R. Bailey & Co. announced it was getting into electric vehicles.</p><h2>Thomas Edison Designed a Bad Battery</h2><p>Bailey’s first model, the Victoria Phaeton, used an <a href="https://ethw.org/Edison%27s_Alkaline_Battery" target="_blank">Edison alkaline battery</a>. Thomas Edison had been working on a lighter, more reliable, and more powerful <a href="https://ethw.org/Edison%27s_Alkaline_Battery" target="_blank">battery for the auto industry</a> since the 1890s, and announced the achievement with great fanfare in 1903. Unfortunately for Bailey and other carmakers who deployed it, the battery leaked and wouldn’t hold a charge. Edison was forced to go back to the drawing board. By 1910, he had a better battery in production, but by then his friend Henry Ford had introduced the Model T, setting the stage for the internal combustion engine to take over the market.</p><p>While Edison toiled to improve his tech, Bailey pivoted to a battery from the Gould Storage Battery Co. of Depew, N.Y. Gould also supplied batteries for railroads, utilities, subways, elevators, and farms. Goodnow’s Victoria Phaeton used a 30-cell lead-acid battery housed in a wooden box that was suspended under the chassis. The standard battery had a range of 64 to 80 kilometers; a larger battery with 50 percent more capacity was available for an upcharge. With the standard battery, the Victoria Phaeton cost US $2,000 (about $73,000 today, or about the list price of an upscale EV like the Audi Q8 or BMW i5).</p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image"> <img alt="Color photo showing an early 20th century car with a red seat, with an electrical apparatus in the background." class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="6ee4d9d5f8d6d1bc7c05a5ea9cdfaafc" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="0c1a1" loading="lazy" src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/color-photo-showing-an-early-20th-century-car-with-a-red-seat-with-an-electrical-apparatus-in-the-background.jpg?id=68537149&width=980"/> <small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">Fannie Goodnow’s electric car charger now resides at the Heritage Museums & Gardens in Sandwich, Mass. But her 1908 Bailey Victoria Phaeton has been lost to history. Shown here is a 1911 version of that model.</small><small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit...">Sarah Thornington/Heritage Museums & Gardens</small></p><p>Goodnow installed a mercury-arc rectifier charging station in the barn adjacent to her parents’ summer home in Hull, Mass. Bill Lillie of <a href="https://vintageelectriccars.com/default.aspx" target="_blank">Vintage Electric Cars</a> notes that the charging plug was of an unusual design. This is, of course, one of the banes of any early adopter: nonstandardized plugs and cables. The Electric Vehicle Association of America, which formed in 1910, tried to put forward a standard so that electric vehicles could be charged at any charging station. (Modern EV owners can <a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/ev-charging-adapters" target="_blank">no doubt relate</a>.) But savvy electric car owners knew to carry spare plug adapters and cables when traveling.</p><p>When Edison’s improved battery was finally available, Bailey began using it in the Victoria Phaeton and then went on a publicity blitz. In September 1910, the carmaker sponsored a round-trip tour from New York to Boston, with a side trip up New Hampshire’s Mount Washington, totaling about 1,600 km. Sadly, the “<a href="https://mt-washington.com/bumper-sticker/" target="_blank">This Car Climbed Mt. Washington</a>” bumper sticker hadn’t yet become popular. </p><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image"> <img alt="Black and white photo of an older white man in a suit standing next to an early 20th century car, with two younger men sitting inside the vehicle. A sign on the front of the car says in part \u201c1000 mile endurance run.\u201d" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="98daccb2815b0cb8d6ebbf7d2bcdb071" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="70ad7" loading="lazy" src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/black-and-white-photo-of-an-older-white-man-in-a-suit-standing-next-to-an-early-20th-century-car-with-two-younger-men-sitting-i.jpg?id=68537097&width=980"/> <small class="image-media media-caption" placeholder="Add Photo Caption...">Thomas Edison supplied the batteries for an electric car made by S.R. Bailey & Co., which then went on a publicity road trip from New York to Boston. </small><small class="image-media media-photo-credit" placeholder="Add Photo Credit..."><a href="https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/edison-with-bailey-electric-car/9QEP9LivWPhwOw" target="_blank">miSci—Museum of Innovation and Science</a></small></p><p>Although Thomas Edison posed for a photo with the new Bailey Victoria Phaeton that featured his new battery, he himself chose a <a href="https://www.thomasedison.org/thomas-edison-historical-garage" target="_blank">Detroit Electric Victoria</a> for his own use. (Edison was known to be a terrible driver, so someone else likely chauffeured him around.) </p><p>Unable to compete against the rising tide of Model Ts, S.R. Bailey sold its factory in 1915, having produced about 500 to 600 electric vehicles.</p><p>Although the vehicle Fannie Goodnow chose turned out to be just a blip in automotive history, I like to imagine her driving about town in a beautiful car that embodied all the quirks of early adoption. I hope her friends didn’t make fun of her for investing in electric just before internal combustion took off. I hope she didn’t get stranded without the proper charging cable. I do not know what happened to her or her Victoria Phaeton, but her charging station remained in situ until 2022, when it was donated to the <a href="https://heritagemuseumsandgardens.catalogaccess.com/objects/5896" target="_blank">Heritage Museums & Gardens</a> in Sandwich, Mass. Now it stands ready to tell stories of technological change and adoption that continue to resonate today.</p><p><em><em>Part of a </em></em><a href="https://spectrum.ieee.org/collections/past-forward/" target="_self"><em><em>continuing series</em></em></a><em> </em><em><em>looking at historical artifacts that embrace the boundless potential of technology.</em></em></p><p><em><em>An abridged version of this article appears in the November 2026 print issue.</em></em></p><h3>References</h3><br/><p>For a detailed history of the development of the mercury-arc rectifier (or valve), see Deepak Tiku’s <a href="https://magazine.ieee-pes.org/marchapril-2014/history-12/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">article</a> in the March/April 2014 issue of <em>IEEE Power & Energy Magazine.</em></p><p>Harry Cooke Cushing Jr., a fellow of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers, wrote (and updated regularly over a number of years) <a href="https://archive.org/details/electricvehicleh00cush/mode/2up" target="_blank"><em><em>The Electric Vehicle Hand-Book</em></em></a><em>, </em>which gave general instructions for the care and storage of batteries, including how to charge them with a <a href="https://archive.org/details/electricvehicleh00cush/page/156/mode/2up" target="_blank">mercury-arc rectifier</a>. Discussion of the mercury-arc rectifier begins on <a href="https://archive.org/details/electricvehicleh00cush/page/156/mode/2up" target="_blank">page 156</a> of the 10th edition, published in 1922. (The American Institute of Electrical Engineers is one of the predecessor organizations of the IEEE.)</p> Reference: https://ift.tt/BWQrSTG

Friday, October 30, 2026

Anthropic VS code extension on Cursor backdoored for nearly 12 hours


<p>An official extension for Anthropic’s Claude model was backdoored and threatened as many as 5,000 developers' machines, multiple sources reported Friday. Anthropic so far has yet to warn customers of the incident.</p> <p>The compromised package was a VS Code extension available in the marketplace of Cursor, a maker of AI-assisted developer tools, the company <a href="https://cursor.com/blog/claude-code-extension-security-notice">said</a> Friday. The malicious version, 2.1.313, subsequently affected “at most 5,000 users,” presumably when they either downloaded it or their systems automatically fetched and installed it. Anthropic pushed version 2.1.314 several hours after the previous version became available on Cursor, <a href="https://doublepulsar.com/anthropic-hacked-to-deliver-remote-access-trojan-to-claude-developer-laptops-worldwide-1148a92baae2">according to</a> independent researcher Kevin Beaumont. Both Beaumont and the CTO and co-founder of security firm Phorian said that version 2.1.313 was distributed through Anthropic’s official account on Cursor. So far, neither Cursor nor Anthropic has explained how the attackers gained control of the account.</p> <h2>In search of cloud credentials</h2> <p>“It was a supply-chain compromise where the attacker gained access to the official distribution channel,” Phorian CTO and co-founder Luke Roberts told Ars. “The malicious version 2.1.313 was posted to the official Anthropic account, effectively superseding 2.1.312. Extensions auto-update in Cursor by default, but users can configure this in settings.” Phorian has more details <a href="https://phorion.io/blog/offical-claude-code-vsx-compromise/">here</a>.</p><p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/10/anthropic-vs-code-extension-on-cursor-backdoored-for-nearly-12-hours/">Read full article</a></p> <p><a href="https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/10/anthropic-vs-code-extension-on-cursor-backdoored-for-nearly-12-hours/#comments">Comments</a></p> Reference : https://ift.tt/Tw7E3ui

Thursday, October 29, 2026

Consumer Appetite for Personal AI Goes Mainstream


<img src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/smiling-man-in-headphones-with-on-screen-alerts-for-calendar-emails-and-awareness-mode.png?id=68506456&width=1245&height=700&coordinates=0%2C112%2C0%2C113"/><br/><br/><p><em>This article is brought to you by <a href="https://www.qualcomm.com/" target="_blank">Qualcomm Technologies</a>.</em></p><p>For many consumers, much of the promise and appeal of AI is personal. Consumers are looking past generic tools and want to know how these technologies will help them in their daily lives. These trends coincide with the advent of new classes of wearable devices that, in addition to being able to leverage powerful frontier models, feature built-in intelligence that understand the context of a user. Where are they? What are they seeing and hearing? What are their habits, their preferences, their schedules?</p><p>It’s an astonishing pivot, from passive accessories that served mostly to send users smartphone notifications to proactive, intelligent companions. The smartphone is no longer the center of that universe; though it’s still incredibly important, in this personal AI paradigm, the AI is the UI. And it shifts the focus toward you, the user.</p><p>These new technologies are exciting. But what do consumers really want?</p><p><a href="https://content.knowledgehub.wiley.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/QUL8805_PersonalAI_WhitePaper_0907_v06a.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">A Personal AI report</a>, commissioned by Qualcomm Technologies, built on a survey of more than 12,000 people across key geographies worldwide (the U.S., U.K., Germany, India, Brazil, and China) focused on the rise of personal AI in intelligent wearables looks deeply at these developments.</p><p class="pull-quote">The smartphone is no longer the center of that universe; though it’s still incredibly important, in this personal AI paradigm, the AI is the UI.</p><p>Survey respondents are less interested in single devices and are responding more to the idea of connected ecosystems. As people expand their roster of devices, it only makes sense. Instead of relying entirely on a smartphone and a laptop, respondents also have connected technology in their cars, as well as intelligent wearables like smartwatches, smart glasses, hearables, and other wearables like rings, pins, and pendants. They want those devices to work in concert, and the way to do that is to decentralize any single one of them. Instead, the AI agent that knows the user and works across all of those devices becomes the unifying factor.</p><p>Consider a typical workday: A user’s watch detects it is time to leave for a meeting and, with permission, their AI agent factors in calendar details, real-time traffic and battery status across their devices. In the car, it suggests the best route and briefs them on their meeting agenda. As they arrive, smart glasses surface a discreet reminder, such as the meeting location or the name of a new contact, while the phone stays in their pocket. No one device has to do everything; each plays the role it is best suited for, coordinated by a personal AI agent that understands the user’s context and acts only at the user’s direction.</p><p>With this in mind, simply adding more hardware to the mix isn’t sufficient. Even though respondents will be open to new form factors, they’ll demand more from their ecosystem of devices. They’ll be sensitive to points of friction and needless complexity, and they’ll require each new device to bring something new to the table — “incremental intelligence, convenience, or contextual awareness that their existing devices cannot deliver on their own what the report,” reads the report.</p><p>The usage trends are up. The report found that those who own wearables are already using AI frequently (60 percent use it at least weekly), which indicates that it’s becoming less of a fun experiment for early adopters and more of a critical mass habit.</p><p>The “always-on” nature of intelligent wearables appears to be winning respondents, too. The report found the following statistics on average continuous wear among users:</p><ul><li>True wireless earbuds – 3 hours</li><li>Wireless headphones – 3 hours</li><li>Smart glasses – 5 hours</li><li>Audio glasses – 6 hours</li><li>Smartwatches – 9 hours</li><li>Smart rings, necklaces and pendants – 8 hours</li></ul><p class="pull-quote">Consumers want AI that is personal and understands their context — <span>they’re looking for smooth, intuitive experiences that are marked by privacy, security, and user control.</span></p><h2>Consumer Trust Is Hard-Won</h2><p>But for all the excitement and engagement around intelligent wearables, there’s a gating factor: trust. As use cases for intelligent wearables expands to more personal and persistent experiences, trust is a necessity for Personal AI.</p><p>The top reported issues around adoption are privacy, security, and user control. The data points to a certain amount of caution around deeply personal use cases, like voice, health, and location, as almost 60 percent of respondents want to keep data from their wearables private, or at least insist on gaining approval before it gets shared.</p><p>In other words, even though premium features like high-quality audio, perception sensing, battery life, and comfort whet consumer appetites (and agentic AI capabilities drive upgrade intent), true adoption will come only with consumer trust. They want security, privacy, transparency and control.</p><p><span>Notably, the report found that respondents expressed more interest in adopting intelligent wearables when Snapdragon was introduced as the enabling platform. This reinforces the value of having an established, trusted technology foundation in the mix.</span></p><h2>The Industry Remains Fluid</h2><p>The report shows that consumer appetite for AI is high, with 60-70 percent of those surveyed expressing interest in advanced AI as they consider a new device. That’s a constant. But remaining purchase drivers differed between device categories.</p><p>Audio playback quality is the most influential purchase driver for true wireless earbuds and headphones. For smartwatches, it’s display quality and responsiveness. Respondents are less concerned about technical specifications than aesthetics like materials and finish when it comes to devices like smart rings and pendants. And for smart glasses, it’s all about the type of control, whether it’s voice, gesture, or touch.</p><div class="ieee-sidebar-medium"><p class="shortcode-media shortcode-media-rebelmouse-image" style="margin-top: 0;"> <a href="https://content.knowledgehub.wiley.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/QUL8805_PersonalAI_WhitePaper_0907_v06a.pdf" target="_blank"></a><a class="shortcode-media-lightbox__toggle shortcode-media-controls__button material-icons" style="background: gray;" title="Select for lightbox">aspect_ratio</a><a href="https://content.knowledgehub.wiley.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/QUL8805_PersonalAI_WhitePaper_0907_v06a.pdf" target="_blank"><img alt="Man in suit wearing AI wearable pendant, Snapdragon report cover on personal AI" class="rm-shortcode" data-rm-shortcode-id="67c33ed1fa8f213674863d26b39a2be2" data-rm-shortcode-name="rebelmouse-image" id="3a4c6" loading="lazy" src="https://spectrum.ieee.org/media-library/man-in-suit-wearing-ai-wearable-pendant-snapdragon-report-cover-on-personal-ai.jpg?id=68530945&width=980"/></a></p><h3 style="padding-top: 16px;">The Rise of Personal AI in Intelligent Wearables</h3><p>Artificial intelligence is entering a new phase, one that is deeply personal, continuously present, and seamlessly embedded into the devices we wear every day. This evolution, which we define as “Personal AI”, represents a shift away from generic, cloud-only intelligence toward AI that understands individuals in context: their habits, preferences, environments, and intent, in real time.</p><p><a href="https://content.knowledgehub.wiley.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/QUL8805_PersonalAI_WhitePaper_0907_v06a.pdf" target="_blank">Get the full report</a> →</p></div><h2></h2><p> Alongside these purchase drivers is another key finding: Consumer appetite for Personal AI agents has gone mainstream. The report says that 70 percent of respondents “express strong interest in an AI assistant that can interact naturally through voice and seamlessly manage devices, apps, and everyday tasks.” With each individual as the center of their own ecosystem, voice becomes the most critical, natural method for interacting with agents.</p><h2>The Opportunity</h2><p>The industry for intelligent wearables is exciting. It’s clear that consumer demand for Personal AI is high, and this report dives deeply into the specifics of what respondents want out of it. They want AI that is personal and understands their context, and they want it to be proactive and helpful instead of merely reactive. They’re looking for smooth, intuitive experiences that are marked by privacy, security, and user control.</p><p>Intelligent wearables comprise much of the hardware of this “ecosystem of you.” Consumers are interested in ecosystems instead of single devices, and they’re looking for agentic AI capabilities that understand and act on their behalf.</p><p>Yet so much of the industry remains undefined. OEMs and technology makers have an enormous opportunity right now to innovate and iterate on the strong technological foundations that platform makers are building. And the roadmap for what consumers want is clear.</p><p><em>All percentages, consumer behaviors, and attitudes stated in this report are based only on the responses of the individuals who participated in our survey.</em></p> Reference: https://ift.tt/O6GWUIf

Binance says hackers who stole billions in crypto spent months planning heist

<p>The hackers who stole billions of dollars in cryptocurrency from the Binance exchange spent months wor...