IEEE Professional Development Suite Teaches In-Demand Skills

In today’s technological landscape, the only constant is the rate of obsolescence. As engineers move deeper into the eras of 6G, ubiquitous artificial intelligence, and hyper-miniaturized electronics, a traditional degree is only a starting point.

To remain competitive in today’s job market, technical specialists must evolve into future-ready professionals by cultivating more than just niche expertise. Success now demands a high degree of adaptive intelligence and strategic communication, allowing specialists to translate complex data into actionable business decisions as industry shifts accelerate.

To bridge the gap between technical proficiency and organizational leadership, the IEEE Professional Development Suite offers training on programs designed to build the strategic competencies required to navigate today’s complex landscape. The suite provides deep technical dives into domains such as telecommunications connectivity and microelectronics reliability. Organizations can stay ahead of the curve through informed decision-making and a future-ready workforce.

Mastery of electrostatic discharge and 5G networks

Within the semiconductor sector, which is projected to become a US $1 billion industry by 2030, electrostatic discharge (ESD) is a major reliability challenge. Because even a microscopic, unnoticed discharge can compromise a semiconductor, ESD issues account for up to one-third of all field failures, according to the EOS/ESD Association.

IEEE’s targeted training—the online Practical ESD Protection Design certificate program—equips teams with technical protocols to mitigate the risks and ensure long-term hardware reliability. Specialized ESD training has become essential for chip designers and manufacturing professionals seeking to improve discharge control.

The interactive modules cover theory, real-world case studies, and practical mitigation techniques. The standards-based instruction is aligned with ANSI/ESD S20.20–21: Protection of Electrical and Electronic Parts and other industry guidelines.

As 5G network capabilities expand globally, so does the demand for engineers who can master the protocols and procedures required to manage complex telecommunications systems. The IEEE 5G/6G Essential Protocols and Procedures Training and Innovation Testbed, in partnership with Wray Castle, takes a deep dive into the 5G network function framework, registration processes, and packet data unit session establishment. The program is designed for system engineers, integrators, and technical professionals responsible for 5G signaling. Stakeholders such as network operators, equipment vendors, regulators, and handset manufacturers could find the program to be beneficial as well.

“The IEEE Professional Development Suite ensures that learners are not just keeping pace with change but helping to drive it.”

To bridge the gap between theory and practice, the course includes three months of free access to the IEEE 5G/6G Innovation Testbed. The secure, cloud-based platform offers a private, end-to-end 5G network environment where individuals and teams can gain hands-on experience with critical system signaling and troubleshooting.

Leadership training programs

Technical knowledge alone is not enough to climb the corporate ladder. To thrive today, engineering leaders must have a strategic vision and people-centric leadership skills.

The IEEE Leading Technical Teams training program focuses on the challenges of managing engineers in R&D environments and fostering creative problem-solving through an immersive learning experience. It’s designed for professionals who have been in a leadership position for at least six months. Participants can gain self-awareness.

The program includes a 360-degree assessment that gathers feedback about the individual from peers and direct reports to build a personalized development plan. The goal is to help technical professionals transition from high-performing individual contributors into leaders who drive innovation by inspiring their teams rather than just managing tasks.

Organizations can enroll groups of 10 or more to learn as a cohort—which can ensure that everyone stays on the same page while setting a training schedule that fits the team’s deadlines.

In collaboration with the Rutgers Business School, IEEE offers two mini MBA programs to bridge the gap between technical expertise and executive leadership. The programs offer flexibility to fit the demanding schedules of senior professionals. The online format lets participants engage with content as their time permits, while live virtual office hours with faculty provide opportunities for real-time interaction.

During the mini MBA for engineers 12-week curriculum, technical professionals master core competencies such as financial analysis, business strategy, and negotiation to effectively transition into management roles.

The mini MBA in artificial intelligence embeds AI literacy directly into business strategy rather than treating the technology as a standalone subject. Participants learn to evaluate AI through financial modeling and governance frameworks, gaining a practical foundation to lead initiatives that incorporate the technology.

The programs are offered to individuals as well as to organizations interested in training groups of 10 employees or more.

Earning credits that count

All the programs within the IEEE Professional Development Suite offer continuing education units and professional development hours.

Earning globally recognized credits provides a professional advantage, signaling a commitment to growth that often serves as a prerequisite for advancing into senior, lead, or principal roles. Additionally, the credits satisfy annual professional engineering license renewal requirements, ensuring practitioners remain compliant while expanding their capabilities.

Why curated content matters

Developed by IEEE Educational Activities, the training programs are peer-reviewed and built to align with industry needs. By focusing on upskilling (improving current skills) and reskilling (learning new ones), the IEEE Professional Development Suite ensures that learners are not just keeping pace with change but helping to drive it.

Reference: https://ift.tt/O0UVn5k

Video Friday: Beep! Beep! Roadrunner Bipedal Bot Breaks the Mold

Video Friday is your weekly selection of awesome robotics videos, collected by your friends at IEEE Spectrum robotics. We also post a weekly calendar of upcoming robotics events for the next few months. Please send us your events for inclusion.

ICRA 2026: 1–5 June 2026, VIENNA

RSS 2026: 13–17 July 2026, SYDNEY

Summer School on Multi-Robot Systems: 29 July–4 August 2026, PRAGUE

Enjoy today’s videos!

“Roadrunner” is a new bipedal wheeled robot prototype designed for multi-modal locomotion. It weighs around 15 kg (33 lb) and can seamlessly switch between its side-by-side and in-line wheel modes and stepping configurations depending on what is required for navigating its environment. The robot’s legs are entirely symmetric, allowing it to point its knees forward or backward, which can be used to avoid obstacles or manage specific movements. A single control policy was trained to handle both side-by-side and in-line driving. Several behaviors, including standing up from various ground configurations and balancing on one wheel, were successfully deployed zero-shot on the hardware.

[ Robotics and AI Institute ]

Incredibly (INCREDIBLY!) NASA says that this is actually happening.

NASA’s SkyFall mission will build on the success of the Ingenuity Mars helicopter, which achieved the first powered, controlled flight on another planet. Using a daring mid-air deployment, SkyFall will deliver a team of next-gen Mars helicopters to scout human landing sites and map subsurface water ice.

[ NASA ]

NASA’s MoonFall mission will blaze a path for future Artemis missions by sending four highly mobile drones to survey the lunar surface around the Moon’s South Pole ahead of astronauts’ arrival there. MoonFall is built on the legacy of NASA’s Ingenuity Mars Helicopter. The drones will be launched together and released during descent to the surface. They will land and operate independently over the course of a lunar day (14 Earth days) and will be able to explore hard-to-reach areas, including permanently shadowed regions (PSRs), surveying terrain with high-definition optical cameras and other potential instruments.

For what it’s worth, Moon landings have a success rate well under 50%. So let’s send some robots there to land over and over!

[ NASA ]

In Science Robotics, researchers from the Tangible Media group led by Professor Hiroshi Ishii, together with colleagues from Politecnico di Bari, present Electrofluidic Fiber Muscles: a new class of artificial muscle fibers for robots and wearables. Unlike the rigid servo motors used in most robots, these fiber-shaped muscles are soft and flexible. They combine electrohydrodynamic (EHD) fiber pumps — slender tubes that move liquid using electric fields to generate pressure silently, with no moving parts — with fluid-filled fiber actuators. These artificial muscles could enable more agile untethered robots, as well as wearable assistive systems with compact actuation integrated directly into textiles.

[ MIT Media Lab ]

In this study, we developed MEVIUS2, an open-source quadruped robot. It is comparable in size to Boston Dynamics Spot, equipped with two LiDARs and a C1 camera, and can freely climb stairs and steep slopes! All hardware, software, and learning environments are released as open source.

[ MEVIUS2 ]

Thanks, Kento!

What goes into preparing for a live performance? Arun highlights the reliability testing that goes into trying a new behavior for Spot.

[ Boston Dynamics ]

In this work, a multi-robot planning and control framework is presented and demonstrated with a team of 40 indoor robots, including both ground and aerial robots.

That soundtrack though.

[ GitHub ]

Thanks, Keisuke!

Quadrupedal robots can navigate cluttered environments like their animal counterparts, but their floating-base configuration makes them vulnerable to real-world uncertainties. Controllers that rely only on proprioception (body sensing) must physically collide with obstacles to detect them. Those that add exteroception (vision) need precisely modeled terrain maps that are hard to maintain in the wild. DreamWaQ++ bridges this gap by fusing both modalities through a resilient multi-modal reinforcement learning framework. The result: a single controller that handles rough terrains, steep slopes, and high-rise stairs—while gracefully recovering from sensor failures and situations it has never seen before.

That cliff behavior is slightly uncanny.

[ DreamWaQ++ ]

I take issue with this from iRobot:

While the pyramid exploration that iRobot did was very cool, they did it with a custom made robot designed for a very specific environment. Cleaning your floors is way, way harder. Here’s a bit more detail on the pyramids thing:

[ iRobot ]

More robots in circus please!

[ Daniel Simu ]

MIT engineers have designed a wristband that lets wearers control a robotic hand with their own movements. By moving their hands and fingers, users can direct a robot to perform specific tasks, or they can manipulate objects in a virtual environment with high-dexterity control.

[ MIT ]

At NVIDIA GTC 2026, we showcased how AI is moving into the physical world. Visitors interacted with robots using voice commands, watching them interpret intent and act in real time — powered by our KinetIQ AI brain.

[ Humanoid ]

Props to Sony for their continued support and updates for Aibo!

[ Aibo ]

This robot looks like it could be a little curvier than normal?

[ LimX Dynamics ]

Developed by Zhejiang Humanoid Robot Innovation Center Co., Ltd., the Naviai Robot is an intelligent cooking device. It can autonomously process ingredients, perform cooking tasks with high accuracy, adjust smart kitchen equipment in real time, and complete post-cooking cleaning. Equipped with multi-modal perception technology, it adapts to daily kitchen environments and ensures safe and stable operation.

That 7x is doing some heavy lifting.

[ Zhejiang Lab ]

This CMU RI Seminar is by Hadas Kress-Gazit from Cornell, on “Formal Methods for Robotics in the Age of Big Data.”

Formal methods – mathematical techniques for describing systems, capturing requirements, and providing guarantees – have been used to synthesize robot control from high-level specification, and to verify robot behavior. Given the recent advances in robot learning and data-driven models, what role can, and should, formal methods play in advancing robotics? In this talk I will give a few examples for what we can do with formal methods, discuss their promise and challenges, and describe the synergies I see with data-driven approaches.

[ Carnegie Mellon University Robotics Institute ]

Reference: https://ift.tt/OPsyoC3

A New Way to Spray Paint Color

We’re all familiar with mixing red, yellow, and blue paint in various ratios to instantly make all kinds of colors. This works great for oils or watercolors, but fails when it comes to cans of spray paint. The paint droplets can’t be blended once they are aerosolized. Consequently, although spray cans are great for applying even coats of paint to large areas very quickly, spray-paint artists need a separate can for every color they want to use—until now.

Back in 2018, when I first saw professional spray artists lugging dozens to hundreds of cans to their work sites, I was inspired to start noodling on a solution. I’ve worked at Google X, Alphabet’s “moonshot factory,” as a hardware engineer, and I’m now building a startup in mechanical-design software. I’m no painter, but I know my way around mechatronics.

I wanted my solution to be inexpensive and simple enough to build as a DIY project and functional enough for an artist to use, without breaking their flow. So I began prototyping a system that combines base colors while they are still in pressurized form from off-the-shelf cans.

This new rotary pinch valve can be opened and closed in tens of milliseconds and prevents backpressure from clogging lines.James Provost

I tried a few approaches where pres-surized paint from the base-color cansfed through tubes into a mixing channel, before emerging from a spray head. To control the ratios, I decided to borrow a trick that would be familiar to anyone who’s ever had to control the bright-ness of an LED using a microcontroller: pulse-width modulation. Initially, I used electronically controlled solenoid valves to release the paint from the cans. The paint would flow into a mixing channel for a relative duration that corresponded to the ratio of the base colors required to make a given hue. However, this failed because different cans never have the same internal pressure. Whenever two valves were open at the same time, the pressure difference would make paint flow backward into the lower-pressure can.

As an alternative, I removed the mixing channel and tried making the paint pulses from each can sequentially converge into a tube so that no more than one valve would ever be open at a time. Surprisingly, this worked perfectly. The backflow was eliminated, and it turned out that the natural turbulence of the flow was sufficient to mix the paints. Let’s say you want to produce a clementine orange color. This requires yellow and red paint in a ratio of 1:2, so the yellow valve opens for a period of time, and then the red valve opens for twice as long. The system then keeps repeating this cycle of pulses in a rapid pace to instantly create the spray-paint color you want.

The theory is straightforward, but making this work in practice took quite a bit of experimentation. First, I had to determine the actual durations of pulses that would produce evenly mixed colors, not just their ratios. I also needed to work out the size of the tubing (too narrow and you’d get low spray force; too wide and you’d have paint accumulating in the tubes). Eventually I settled on a maximum pulse duration of 250 milliseconds and a tube diameter of 1 millimeter.

Inventing A New Valve

Even though the system worked, the solenoid valves I used constantly clogged up. Designed for water purifiers, the valves didn’t prevent paint from entering the mechanism, where the paint would harden. Moreover, when the valves were turned off, they could stop backflow only if the inlet remained pressurized. So disconnecting a paint can from the system would cause instant leaking. Other off-the-shelf valves I tried couldn’t cycle fast enough and were too expensive.

I had some spectacular failures along the way of the sort that only pressurized paint can provide.

So I created my own mechanism: a high-speed, electronically controlled, rotary pinch valve. It has a stepper motor that rotates a lever with a rolling bearing to constrict fluid flow inside a flexible tube. This concept isn’t new—there’s something like them in every peristaltic pump. But I added a spring to firmly hold the lever in the closed position against any back pressure when the motor isn’t powered, making it a normally closed valve that isolates the attached can. Additionally, the valve is fast enough to be open for as little as 30 milliseconds.

I went through four major prototypes of the system before reaching a working version, and I had some spectacular failures along the way of the sort that only pressurized paint can provide. The final version uses four base colors—red, yellow, blue, and white—with the color mix controlled by four knobs attached to an Arduino Nano and a small display. The flow of paint is triggered by a push button placed above the spray head, similar to a spray can’s nozzle.

Cans holding base colors (A) are attached to valves (B). An Arduino-based control panel (C) opens and closes valves to mix paint before it is aerosolized (E). By quickly opening and closing valves with varying durations in sequence (D), you can mix paint in specific ratios to create desired colors.James Provost

The length of time a base color’s paint valve can be open is one of eight values between 30 and 250 ms. This means that the entire system—which I coincidentally dubbed Spectrum—can create hundreds of distinct spray-paint colors instantly. It produces less than 8⁴ (or 4,096) colors because duration ratios that are a multiple of each other will produce the same color—for example, 2:3 and 4:6. I added a force sensor to the push button, which allows for a gradient: Two color mixes can be dialed in, and as I increase my thumb’s pressure on the button, the paint mix shifts from one color to the other.

Spectrum’s various fixtures are 3D-printed, and project files and videos are available through my website at https://www.sandeshmanik.com/projects/spectrum. Preprints of technical descriptions of the rotary pinch valve and mixing methodology are available on TechRxiv. The total cost for the bill of materials is less than US $150.

Working on and off on the side for about seven years, I finally finished developing my system and writing the documentation in late 2025. After I posted a video to social media, I was heartened by the immediate positive response from spray-paint artists around the world. I’m now creating step-by-step instructions so that nontechnical people can build their own Spectrum paint sprayer. I look forward to seeing what creations artists out in the wild make!

Reference: https://ift.tt/WPDm1AY

How NYU’s Quantum Institute Bridges Science and Application

This sponsored article is brought to you by NYU Tandon School of Engineering.

Within a 6 mile radius of New York University’s (NYU) campus, there are more than 500 tech industry giants, banks, and hospitals. This isn’t just a fact about real estate, it’s the foundation for advancing quantum discovery and application.

While the world races to harness quantum technology, NYU is betting that the ultimate advantage lies not solely in a lab, but in the dense, demanding, and hyper-connected urban ecosystem that surrounds it. With the launch of its NYU Quantum Institute (NYUQI), NYU is positioning itself as the central node in this network; a “full stack” powerhouse built on the conviction that it has found the right place, and the right time, to turn quantum science into tangible reality.

Proximity advantage is essential because quantum science demands it. Globally, the quest for practical quantum solutions — whether for computing, sensing, or secure communications — has been stalled, in part, by fragmentation. Physicists and chemical engineers invent new materials, computer scientists develop new algorithms, and electrical engineers build new devices, but all three often work in isolated academic silos.

Gregory Gabadadze, NYU’s dean for science, NYU physicist and Quantum Institute Director Javad Shabani, and Juan de Pablo, Anne and Joel Ehrenkranz Executive Vice President for Global Science and Technology and executive dean of the Tandon School of Engineering.Veselin Cuparić/NYU

NYUQI’s premise is that breakthroughs happen “at the interfaces between different domains,” according to Juan de Pablo, Executive Vice President for Global Science and Technology at NYU and Executive Dean of the NYU Tandon School of Engineering. The Institute is built to actively force those necessary collisions — to integrate the physicists, engineers, materials scientists, computer scientists, biologists, and chemists vital to quantum research into one holistic operation. This institutional design ensures that the hardware built by one team can be immediately tested by software developed by another, accelerating progress in a way that isolated departments never could.

NYUQI’s premise is that breakthroughs happen at the interfaces between different domains. —Juan de Pablo, NYU Tandon School of Engineering

NYUQI’s integrated vision is backed by a massive physical commitment to the city. The NYUQI is not just a theoretical concept; its collaborators will be housed in a renovated, million-square-foot facility in the heart of Manhattan’s West Village, backed by a state-of-the-art Nanofabrication Cleanroom in Brooklyn serving as a high-tech foundry. This is where the theoretical meets physical devices, allowing the Institute to test and refine the process from materials science to deployment.

NYUQI will be housed in a renovated, million-square-foot facility in the heart of Manhattan’s West Village.Tracey Friedman/NYU

Leading this effort is NYUQI Director Javad Shabani, who, along with the other members, is turning the Institute into a hub for collaboration with private and public sector partners with quantum challenges that need solving. As de Pablo explains, “Anybody who wants to work on quantum with NYU, you come in through that door, and we’ll send you to the right place.” For New York’s vast ecosystem of tech giants and financial institutions, the NYUQI offers a resource they can’t build on their own: a cohesive team of experts in quantum phenomena, quantum information theory, communication, computing, materials, and optics, and a structured path to applying theoretical discoveries to advanced quantum technologies.

Solving the Challenge of Quantum Research

The NYUQI’s integrated structure is less about organizational management, and more about scientific requirement. The challenge of quantum is that the hardware, the software, and the programming are inherently interconnected — each must be designed to work with the other. To solve this, the Institute focuses on three applications of quantum science: Quantum Computing, Quantum Sensing, and Quantum Communications.

For Shabani, this means creating an integrated environment that bridges discovery with experimentation, starting with the physical components all the way to quantum algorithm centers. That will include a fabrication facility in the new building in Manhattan, as well as the NYU Nanofab in Brooklyn directed by Davood Shahjerdi. New York Senators Charles Schumer and Kirsten Gillibrand recently secured $1 million in congressionally-directed spending to bring Thermal Laser Epitaxy (TLE) technology — which allows for atomic-level purity, minimal defects, and streamlined application of a diverse range of quantum materials — to NYU, marking the first time the equipment will be used in the U.S.

NYU Nanofab manager Smiti Bhattacharya and Nanofab Director Davood Shahjerdi at the nanofab ribbon-cutting in 2023. The nanofab is the first academic cleanroom in Brooklyn, and serves as a prototyping facility for the NORDTECH Microelectronics Commons consortium.NYU WIRELESS

Tight control over fabrication, and can allow researchers to pivot quickly when a breakthrough in one area — say, finding a cheaper, more reliable material like silicon carbide — can be explored for use across all three applications, and offers unique access to academics and the private sector alike to sophisticated pieces of specialty equipment whose maintenance knowledge and costs make them all-but-impossible to maintain outside of the right staffing and environment.

The NYU Nanofab is Brooklyn’s first academic cleanroom, with a strategic focus on superconducting quantum technologies, advanced semiconductor electronics, and devices built from quantum heterostructures and other next-generation materials.NYU Nanofab

That speed and adaptability is the NYUQI’s competitive edge. It turns fragmented challenges into holistic solutions, positioning the Institute to solve real-world problems for its New York neighbors—from highly secure data transmission to next-generation drug discovery.

Testing Quantum Communication in NYC

The integrated approach also makes the NYUQI a testbed for the most critical near-term applications. Take Quantum Communications, which is essential for creating an “unhackable” quantum internet. In an industry first, NYU worked with the quantum start-up Qunnect to send quantum information through standard telecom fiber in New York City between Manhattan and Brooklyn through a 10-mile quantum networking link. Instead of simulating communication challenges in a lab, the NYUQI team is already leveraging NYU’s city-wide campus by utilizing existing infrastructure to test secure quantum transmission between Manhattan and Brooklyn.

The NYUQI team is already leveraging NYU’s city-wide campus by utilizing existing infrastructure to test secure quantum transmission between Manhattan and Brooklyn.

This isn’t just theory; it is building a functioning prototype in the most demanding, dense urban environment in the world. Real-time, real-world deployment is a critical component missing in other isolated institutions. When the NYUQI achieves results, the technology will be that much more readily available to the massive financial, tech, and communications organizations operating right outside their door.

NYUQI includes a state-of-the-art Nanofabrication Cleanroom in Brooklyn serving as a high-tech foundry.NYU Tandon

While the Institute has built the physical infrastructure and designed the necessary scientific architecture, its enduring contribution will be the specialized workforce it creates for the new quantum economy. This addresses the market’s greatest deficit: a lack of individuals trained not just in physics, but in the integrated, full-stack approach that quantum demands.

By creating a pipeline of 100 to 200 graduate and doctoral students who are encouraged to collaborate across Computing, Sensing, and Communications, the NYUQI is narrowing the skills gap. These will be future leaders who can speak the language of the physicist, the materials scientist, and the engineer simultaneously. This commitment to interdisciplinary talent is also fueled by the launch of the new Master of Science in Quantum Science & Technology program at NYU Tandon, positioning the university among a select group worldwide offering such a specialized degree.

Interdisciplinary education creates the shared language and understanding poised to make graduates coming from collaborations in the NYUQI extremely valuable in the current landscape. Quantum challenges are not just technical; they are managerial and philosophical as well. An engineer working with the NYUQI will understand the requirements of the nanofabrication cleanroom and the foundations of superconducting qubits for quantum computing, just as a physicist will understand the application needs of an industry partner like a large financial institution. In a field where the entire team must be able to communicate seamlessly, these are professionals truly equipped to rapidly translate discovery into deployable technology. Creating a talent pipeline at scale will provide a missing link that converts New York’s vast commercial energy into genuine quantum advantage.

NYUQI: Building Talent, Technology, and Structure

The vision for the NYUQI is an act of strategic geography that plays directly into the sheer volume of opportunity and demand right outside their new facility. By building the talent, the technology, and the structure necessary to capitalize on this dense environment, NYU is not just participating in the quantum race, it is actively steering it.

Attendees of NYU’s 2025 Quantum Summit.Tracey Friedman/NYU

The initial hypothesis for the NYUQI was simple: the ultimate advantage lies in pursuing the science in the right place at the right time. Now, the institute will ensure that the next wave of scientific discovery, capable of solving previously intractable problems in finance, medicine, and security, will be conceived, built, and tested in the heart of New York City.

Reference: https://ift.tt/2crlDOC

Google bumps up Q Day deadline to 2029, far sooner than previously thought

Google is dramatically shortening its deadline readiness for the arrival of Q Day, the point at which existing quantum computers can break public-key cryptography algorithms that secure decades' worth of secrets belonging to militaries, banks, governments, and nearly every individual on earth.

In a post published on Wednesday, Google said it is giving itself until 2029 to prepare for this event. The post went on to warn that the rest of the world needs to follow suit by adopting PQC—short for post-quantum cryptography—algorithms to augment or replace elliptic curves and RSA, both of which will be broken.

The end is nigh

“As a pioneer in both quantum and PQC, it’s our responsibility to lead by example and share an ambitious timeline,” wrote Heather Adkins, Google’s VP of security engineering, and Sophie Schmieg, a senior cryptography engineer. “By doing this, we hope to provide the clarity and urgency needed to accelerate digital transitions not only for Google, but also across the industry.”

Read full article

Comments

Reference : https://ift.tt/98OGBMK

What Happens When You Host an AI Café

“Can I get an interview?” “Can I get a job when I graduate?” Those questions came from students during a candid discussion about artificial intelligence, capturing the anxiety many young people feel today. As companies adopt AI-driven interview screeners, restructure their workforces, and redirect billions of dollars toward AI infrastructure, students are increasingly unsure of what the future of work will look like.

We had gathered people together at a coffee shop in Auburn, Alabama for what we called an AI Café. The event was designed to confront concerns about AI directly, demystifying the technology while pushing back against the growing narrative of technological doom.

AI is reshaping society at breathtaking speed. Yet the trajectory of this transformation is being charted primarily by for-profit tech companies, whose priorities revolve around market dominance rather than public welfare. Many people feel that AI is something being done to them rather than developed with them.

As computer science and liberal arts faculty at Auburn University, we believe there is another path forward: One where scholars engage their communities in genuine dialogue about AI. Not to lecture about technical capabilities, but to listen, learn, and co-create a vision for AI that serves the public interest.

The AI Café Model

Last November, we ran two public AI Cafés in Auburn. These were informal, 90-minute conversations between faculty, students, and community members about their experiences with AI. In these conversational forums, participants sat in clusters, questions flowed in multiple directions, and lived experience carried as much weight as technical expertise.

We avoided jargon and resisted attempts to “correct” misconceptions, welcoming whatever emotions emerged. One ground rule proved crucial: keeping discussions in the present, asking participants where they encounter AI today. Without that focus, conversations could easily drift to sci-fi speculation. Historical analogies—to the printing press, electricity, and smartphones—helped people contextualize their reactions. And we found that without shared definitions of AI, people talked past each other; we learned to ask participants to name specific tools they were concerned about.

Organizers Xaq Frohlich, Cheryl Seals, and Joan Harrell (right) held their first AI Café in a welcoming coffee shop and bookstore. Well Red

Most importantly, we approached these events not as experts enlightening the masses, but as community members navigating complex change together.

What We Learned by Listening

Participants arrived with significant frustration. They felt that commercial interests were driving AI development “without consideration of public needs,” as one attendee put it. This echoed deeper anxieties about technology, from social media algorithms that amplify division to devices that profit from “engagement” and replace meaningful face-to-face connection. People aren’t simply “afraid of AI.” They’re weary of a pattern where powerful technologies reshape their lives while they have little say.

Yet when given space to voice concerns without dismissal, something shifted. Participants didn’t want to stop AI development; they wanted to have a voice in it. When we asked, “What would a human-centered AI future look like?” the conversation became constructive. People articulated priorities: fairness over efficiency, creativity over automation, dignity over convenience, community over individualism.

The three organizers, all professors at Alabama’s Auburn University, say that including people from the liberal arts fields brought new perspectives to the discussions about AI. Well Red

For us as organizers, the experience was transformative. Hearing how AI affected people’s work, their children’s education, and their trust in information prompted us to consider dimensions we hadn’t fully grasped. Perhaps most striking was the gratitude participants expressed for being heard. It wasn’t about filling knowledge deficits; it was about mutual learning. The trust generated created a spillover effect, renewing faith that AI could serve the public interest if shaped through inclusive processes.

How to Start Your Own AI Café

The “deficit model” of science communication—where experts transmit knowledge to an uninformed public—has been discredited. Public resistance to emerging technologies reflects legitimate concerns about values, risks, and who controls decision-making. Our events point toward a better model.

We urge engineering and liberal arts departments, professional societies, and community organizations worldwide to organize dialogues similar to our AI Cafés.

We found that a few simple design choices made these conversations far more productive. Informal and welcoming spaces such as coffee shops, libraries, and community centers helped participants feel comfortable (and serving food and drinks helped too!). Starting with small-group discussions, where people talked with neighbors, produced more honest thinking and greater participation. Partnering with colleagues in the liberal arts brought additional perspectives on technology’s social dimensions. And by making a commitment to an ongoing series of events, we built trust.

Facilitation also matters. Rather than leading with technical expertise, we began with values: We asked what kind of world participants wanted, and how AI might help or hinder that vision. We used analogies to earlier technologies to help people situate their reactions, and grounded discussions in present realities, asking participants where they have encountered AI in their daily lives. We welcomed emotions constructively, transforming worry into problem-solving by asking questions like: “What would you do about that?”

Why Engineers Should Engage the Public

Professional ethics codes remain abstract unless grounded in dialogue with affected communities. Conversations about what “responsible AI” means will look different in São Paulo than in Seoul, in Vienna than in Nairobi. What makes the AI Café model portable is its general principles: informal settings, values-first questions, present-tense focus, genuine listening.

Without such engagement, ethical accountability quietly shifts to technical experts rather than remaining a shared public concern. If we let commercial interests define AI’s trajectory with minimal public input, it will only deepen divides and entrench inequities.

AI will continue advancing whether or not we have public trust. But AI shaped through dialogue with communities will look fundamentally different from AI developed solely to pursue what’s technically possible or commercially profitable.

The tools for this work aren’t technical; they’re social, requiring humility, patience, and genuine curiosity. The question isn’t whether AI will transform society. It’s whether that transformation will be done to people or with them. We believe scholars must choose the latter, and that starts with showing up in coffee shops and community centers to have conversations where we do less talking and more listening.

The future of AI depends on it.

Reference: https://ift.tt/xZsRvo2

Are U.S. Engineering Ph.D. Programs Losing Students?

U.S. doctoral programs in electrical engineering form the foundation of technological advancement, training the brightest minds in the world to research, develop, and design next-generation electronics, software, electrical infrastructure, and other high-tech products and systems. Elite institutions have long served as launchpads for the engineers behind tomorrow’s technology.

Now that foundation is under strain.

With U.S. universities increasingly entangled in political battles under the second Trump administration, uncertainty is beginning to ripple through doctoral admissions for electrical engineering programs. While some departments are reducing the number of spots available in anticipation of potential federal funding cuts, others are seeing their applicant pools shrink, particularly among international students, who make up a significant portion of their programs.

In 2024 alone, U.S. universities awarded more than 2,000 doctorates in electrical and computer engineering, according to data from the National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. The number of computing Ph.D.s grew significantly in the 2010s, according to data from the National Academies, but there is still high demand for those with advanced degrees across academia, government, and industry. Now, some universities point to warning signs of waning enrollment.

Though not all engineers have Ph.D.s, if enrollment continues to shrink, fewer doctoral students could mean fewer engineers developing cutting-edge technology and training the next generation, potentially exacerbating existing labor shortages as global competition for tech talent intensifies.

Federal funding cuts affect admissions

Public universities in particular are feeling the strain because they rely heavily on federal grants to support doctoral students.

The University of California, Los Angeles, for instance, must fund Ph.D. students for the duration of a degree—typically five years. In August 2025, the U.S. government pulled more than US $580 million in federal grants over allegations that the university failed to adequately address antisemitism on campus during student protests. A federal judge has since ordered the funding to be restored, but faculty began to worry that research support could be clawed back without notice, says Subramanian Iyer, distinguished professor at UC Los Angeles’s department of electrical and computer engineering.

According to Iyer, departments across UC Los Angeles, including engineering, plan to scale back Ph.D. admissions this year. “The fear is that at some point, all this government money will be taken away,” Iyer says. “Lowering the admissions rate is just a way to prepare for that reality.”

In response to a request for comment, a spokesperson for the U.S. National Science Foundation—a major source of federal research funding at UC Los Angeles and elsewhere—said, “NSF recognizes the essential role doctoral trainees play in the nation’s engineering and STEM enterprise” and noted several of the foundation’s awards and programs that support graduate research.

Funding shocks may also force Pennsylvania State University to reshape future admissions decisions, according to Madhavan Swaminathan, head of Penn State’s electrical engineering department and director of the Center for Heterogeneous Integration of Micro Electronic Systems (CHIMES), a semiconductor research lab.

In 2023, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and industry partners awarded CHIMES a five-year $32.7 million grant. But in late 2025, the agency pulled its final year of funding from the center, citing a shift in priorities from microelectronics to photonics, Swaminathan says. As a result, CHIMES’ annual budget, which supports research assistantships for roughly 100 engineering graduate students, the majority pursuing Ph.D.s, will fall from $7 million in 2026 to $3.5 million in 2027. If these constraints persist, Penn State’s engineering department may reduce the number of doctoral students it supports.

In a statement, a DARPA spokesperson told IEEE Spectrum: “Basic research is central to identifying world-changing technologies, and DARPA remains committed to engaging academic institutions in our program research. By design, a DARPA program typically lasts about 3 to 5 years. Once we establish proof of concept, we transition the technology for further development and turn our attention to other challenging areas of research.”

Penn State’s enrollment numbers reflect Swaminathan’s caution. He says the electrical engineering Ph.D. cohort shrank from 28 students in 2024 to 15 students in 2025. Applications show a similar pattern. After rising from 195 in 2024 to 247 in 2025, Ph.D. applications fell roughly 30 percent to 174 for the upcoming 2026 cohort, a sign that prospective students may be wary of applying to U.S. programs.

Immigration restrictions and application declines

In late January, the Trump administration announced it had paused visa approvals for citizens of 75 countries. Months earlier, the administration proposed new restrictions on student visas, including a four-year cap.

For Texas A&M University’s graduate electrical and computer engineering programs, up to 80 percent of applicants each year are international students, according to Narasimha Annapareddy, professor and head of the department. Annapareddy says applications for the fall 2026 Ph.D. cohort have dropped by roughly 50 percent.

Annapareddy says the United States is “sending a message that migration is going to be more difficult in the future.” Foreign students often pursue degrees in the U.S. not only for academic training, he says, but to build long-term careers and lives in the country. Fewer applications from international students mean that the university forgoes a “driven and hungry” segment of the applicant pool who are highly qualified in technical fields.

“The fear is that at some point, all this government money will be taken away.”— Subramanian Iyer, UC Los Angeles

At the University of Southern California, the decline is more moderate. The freshman Ph.D. class fell from about 90 students in 2024 to roughly 70 in 2025, a reduction of 22 percent, according to Richard Leahy, department chair of USC’s Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering.

While Leahy says applications are down modestly overall, domestic applications have increased by roughly 15 percent. Beyond immigration restrictions, international students, particularly from countries such as India and China, may be staying in their home countries as their technology sectors expand.

“A lot of those students that would normally have come to the U.S. are now taking very good jobs working in the AI industry and other areas,” Leahy says. “There are a lot more opportunities now.”

Workforce pipeline strains

Some faculty say shrinking cohorts could erode the tech workforce if the pattern continues.

At UC Los Angeles, Iyer describes a doctoral ecosystem built on a chain of mentorship. Among the roughly 25 students in his lab, senior doctoral students mentor junior Ph.D. candidates, who in turn guide master’s students and undergraduates. The system depends on overlapping cohorts. Reducing the number of students hired weakens that overlap and the trickle-down benefits of the mentorship model that keeps labs functioning.

The real benefit of the university system isn’t just the teaching but also “the community that you build,” Iyer says. “As you decrease admissions, this will disappear.”

At Penn State, Swaminathan points to specialization as key to a strong workforce. Many doctoral students train in semiconductor engineering, feeding expert talent into the domestic chip industry. If enrollment continues to shrink over the next few years, Swaminathan says, companies may need to hire students with bachelor’s or master’s degrees, who might lack the necessary skills required to design and innovate new chips.

“Without that specialization, there’s only so much one can do,” Swaminathan says.

The industry–academia gap

Not all departments are shrinking. At the University of Texas at Austin, overall enrollment has remained relatively steady, according to Diana Marculescu, chair of UT Austin’s Chandra Family Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering.

While she says recent fluctuations aren’t raising alarms, her concern lies more with alignment between research and industry. Doctoral students often train according to current grant priorities, she says. But by the time graduates enter the job market four to six years later, their specialization may not align neatly with open roles. That creates friction in the talent pipeline.

“That lack of connection might be problematic,” Marculescu says. She argues that closer collaboration between universities and the private sector could help create stronger feedback loops between hiring needs and academic research priorities.

For now, USC’s Leahy says Ph.D. graduates remain in high demand, and the current shifts have not yet translated into measurable workforce shortages. “We should be concerned about the number of Ph.D.s,” he says. “But there isn’t a crisis at this point.”

Reference: https://ift.tt/CSuEYzf